|
[Sponsors] |
September 22, 2021, 06:29 |
duplicated zones don't show up in zone style
|
#1 |
New Member
mody
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5 |
Hi, When I try to duplicate or mirror the zones the duplicated zones don't appear in "zone style" unless I delete the original zones. Also, I noticed that the original zones have a star next to their number.
is there a way to make the original zones and the duplicated ones appear in "zone style"? Thanks in advance zonestyle.PNG |
|
December 10, 2021, 05:06 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Pieter van Uffelen
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey Satarah,
I think the asterisks/stars mean that the data is coupled to a certain time step. Regarding the duplicated zones that won't show in the 'Zone style' dialogue. What worked for me was go to Data>Extract>Blanked Zones... Then answer Yes on the Question 'Blanking is not active. Do you want to continue?'. Select the duplicate zone and click OK. It will now appear in the 'Zone style' dialogue as 'Extracted something' Hope this will work for you. Cheers, Pieter |
|
December 13, 2021, 12:52 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Scott Fowler
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 17 |
A better solution is to use "Edit Time Strands". The asterisk indicates that the data are being treated as "transient" and the duplicated zone is considered to be the same object at the same solution time - which is why you can't see it in Zone Style.
Go to Edit Time Strands and - for the newly duplicated zones - assign a new Strand ID. So what is a Strand ID? It's a number that identifies a series of zones through time as being the same object. So consider a transient simulation of an aircraft where you have a fuselage, wing, and tail. You'd identify all the "fuselage" zones through time as Strand 1, wing as Strand 2, and tail as Strand 3. In this case you'll only have three items in Zone Style as defined by the strand ID. To recap - when duplicating zones, the strand ID is retained which means that the duplicated zone is bundled in the same line in Zone Style. To get the duplicated zone to show up in a new line in Zone Style it needs a different Strand ID than the original zone. |
|
August 6, 2024, 04:19 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
As shown in the figure below, I have simulated a 3D wing in Fluent and applied a periodic boundary condition on its side faces. untitled.jpg Now I want to put several wings together in tecplot and show the corresponding contour on them. I tried with Duplicate and Mirror options. Using Duplicate it didn't show me anything and using the mirror, it only showed me a copy number, and then by mirroring the original and copied wing, it doesn't show me anything. Because I want 8 of them next to each other. I would be grateful if you could help me. Regards Arash Last edited by @Arash; August 6, 2024 at 05:21. |
||
August 6, 2024, 13:56 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Scott Fowler
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 17 |
Arash,
It seems that you not only need to duplicate your data, but also translate it in the Z-direction. Here's a post that describes some of these steps: https://tecplot.com/2016/02/22/creat...ffset-surface/. This is more complex than your case since it translates the data in the cell normal direction, while you likely only need to translate in the Z-direction. If you still have questions, I suggest contacting our support staff. Thanks, Scott |
|
Tags |
techplot 360, tecplot |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Create different zones for magnetic field within a large zone | aashna@iitp | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | January 23, 2020 06:44 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Difficulty in mesh upload to ansys fluent | Ayo_gboyega | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | June 17, 2018 04:02 |
Error in solution using "Grid Interface" | agustinvo | FLUENT | 4 | January 20, 2015 13:03 |
Possible Bug in pimpleFoam (or createPatch) (or fluent3DMeshToFoam) | cfdonline2mohsen | OpenFOAM | 3 | October 21, 2013 10:28 |
Sliding mesh error | Karl Kevala | FLUENT | 4 | February 21, 2001 16:52 |