|
[Sponsors] |
New guy here. Question on Unconstrained shape design of a transonic inviscid airfoil |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
training
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I was doing a tutorial Unconstrained shape design of a transonic inviscid airfoil at a cte AoA. And I cant figure out how final evuluation was chosed as optimal shape. I understand that it try to decreases the drag to minimal but I want to know it in a bit more detail. Can someone explain how final shape is actually chosen?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 596
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
The su2 website contains a list of papers published on the topic of adjoint optimization, e.g. this one from Tom Economon:
https://su2code.github.io/documents/AIAA-2018-3111.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issue on the design change when using the Ansys FLUENT adjoint-based shape optimizer | zyao1 | FLUENT | 0 | December 4, 2020 09:56 |
2D simulation of a Transonic Airfoil at high Reynolds number | ClAuDi0 | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | November 18, 2018 14:25 |
Question regarding optimization triple element airfoil using ANSYS DesignXplorer | Segermans | ANSYS | 0 | April 30, 2018 04:20 |
Question about airfoil 2D simulation using Fluent | Abdelrahman Yousry | FLUENT | 0 | November 26, 2016 07:38 |
Question about SU2 optimization | YoniHe | SU2 Shape Design | 3 | January 15, 2016 00:31 |