CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Residual does not reach min residual

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By aero_amit
  • 1 Post By aero_amit

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 1, 2021, 15:56
Default Residual does not reach min residual
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6
punyaplaban is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,
Hope you all are doing well. I am trying to simulate a wing-fuselage combination using SU2 at low Mach numbers (~ 0.3) and I am using AUSMPLUSUP for the simulation. I have also set USE_ACCURATE_FLUX_JACOBIANS= YES. I get the lift and drag co-efficients being converged but the residual keeps increasing (e.g. from -1.52 to -1.51 in the next iteration) and the simulation runs forever. Any suggestion would help.
punyaplaban is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2021, 12:06
Default
  #2
Member
 
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13
aero_amit is on a distinguished road
You can take clues from available test cases in -
SU2-7.1.0/TestCases/rans folder

Roe scheme should also do a satisfactory job for M=0.3 condition simulations. you can try VENKATAKRISHNAN_WANG limiter as well. Be careful with CFL values (higher initial values may sometimes lead to problems with convergence).
Also if your force/moment coefficients are converged to the right value (even though residuals are stalled), it's fine. There is another convergence criterion in SU2 (CONV_CRITERIA=CAUCHY), which works on the above instead of residual drop, you can give a try to that as well.
punyaplaban likes this.
aero_amit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2021, 16:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6
punyaplaban is on a distinguished road
I tried the above setting but the lift and drag co-efficients just alternate between two values and the residuals still increase. Any suggestions?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CL_CDs.JPG (40.9 KB, 17 views)
punyaplaban is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2021, 23:18
Default
  #4
Member
 
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13
aero_amit is on a distinguished road
For many of the geometries (practical) I have tried, it was rare to get 6 order residual drop or CACHY criterion meeting at 6th or 5th decimal place. You can plot the convergence of force/moment coefficients w.r.t. iterations and see if the mean appears to be stabilized between two small values (graph will look flattish in later iterations). In such case, you can take mean of coefficients for last 100, 500 or 1000 iterations (whatever seems appropriate). Many times I end up with 2 to 4 orders of residual fall (than it stalls) and small oscillations in coefficients. If one is getting considerably large oscillations, it may indicate the need to run an unsteady simulation.
Regarding residual rising, if first it is falling few orders, than rising a bit and becoming flat, it should not be a problem.
punyaplaban likes this.
aero_amit is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Converging Diverging Nozzle with dbnsTurbFoam Saleh Abuhanieh OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 December 13, 2019 11:26
laplacianFoam with source term Herwig OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 17 November 19, 2019 14:47
Segmentation fault when using reactingFOAM for Fluids Tommy Floessner OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 April 22, 2018 13:30
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam turbulent case Aditya Patil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 April 24, 2017 23:13
calculation stops after few time steps sivakumar OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 17, 2013 07:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:27.