CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

How to set up freestream turbulence conditions in incompressible solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By pcg

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 12, 2020, 19:15
Default How to set up freestream turbulence conditions in incompressible solver
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13
hx293 is on a distinguished road
I found the following solution works thanks to pcg. Hope this is helpful.

% Freestream turbulence intensity value (default 0.05), activated for SST only
FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY=0.01
%
% Freestream nut / nu (default 10), activated for SST only
FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO=215.56
%
% Freestream nu_tilde / nu (default 3), activated for SA only
FREESTREAM_NU_FACTOR=215.568

---
% Original post as follows

Hi everyone,

I am running the incompressible RANS solver on a linear compressor cascade case (M=0.12, Rec=3.82*10^5). I tried to feed in the eddy viscosity ratio and the turbulence intensity in the configure file (see attached) as follows:

FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY=0.01
FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO=215.56

However, these values seemed not readed in, and I got nut/nu=0.20 in the freestream (see fig attached). I checked some archived tutorial cases. It seems to me the above options are activated only for compressible RANS solver, but I am not sure if that is true and why it is implemented in this way.

Do you have any ideas?

Cheers,
Xiao
Attached Images
File Type: png nut_nu.png (39.5 KB, 21 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt LMFACC.cfg.txt (8.3 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by hx293; August 13, 2020 at 08:16.
hx293 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2020, 07:02
Default
  #2
pcg
Senior Member
 
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 14
pcg is on a distinguished road
Looking at the code it seems you should use FREESTREAM_NU_FACTOR

The two options you tried seem to be applicable only to k-omega models.

P.S. In principle there are no differences between compressible and incompressible solver, so far as turbulence models go.
hx293 likes this.

Last edited by pcg; August 13, 2020 at 07:03. Reason: more info
pcg is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] Help with element size sandri_92 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 14 November 14, 2018 08:54
Question about adaptive timestepping Guille1811 CFX 25 November 12, 2017 18:38
Question about matching of solver and turbulence model louistse OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 February 1, 2017 22:36
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 07:20
parallel code samiam1000 SU2 3 March 25, 2013 05:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:18.