|
[Sponsors] |
SU2 7.0 Turbulent Onera M6 convergence and result question? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 12, 2020, 01:04 |
SU2 7.0 Turbulent Onera M6 convergence and result question?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello peeps,
So I am running the Turbulent Onera M6 case in seriel on an arm device. Reading the config file it shows the convergence criteria and max iterations. At what iteration should it converge? It shows max iteration of 999999 and I'm currently at 162800 and it's been more than 36 hours. Should I expect it go way longer? Also I notice that the solver writes to file from time to time. I opened up paraview to see the solution so far. I was able to visualize many parameters, but I dont see them change for each time step, is that normal? Example: |
|
June 15, 2020, 10:33 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Martin E.
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi!
I am really not an expert, but to me it looks like the simulation has converged. At the end of the day, the convergence criterion is up to the user, and I still see some fluctuation or trend in what I assume is the cL, but it is only the last digit. Personally I prefer using Cauchy criteria (while also paying attention to residuals), and based on those your results are probably fine. This also explains why the intermediate results you look at in Paraview do not seem to change. In your config file, you should find a convergence section where one you can define criteria other than just iteration count. From my experience, simply setting a fixed number of iterations is not a good idea. Either you will waste time with an already converged solution, or you will abort before it is converged. Both is generally bad. I recommend switching the convergence criterion to residual or Cauchy. Having said that, I want to add that those are recommendations for your next simulations, because the one I see here looks converged to me and thus already completed. Kind regards, Martin |
|
June 15, 2020, 15:57 |
Thanks for the heads up!
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Sultan Islam
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
I was able to run the Aeroelastic tuturial which took 8hrs but met the convergence criteria. I was even able to edit the file to output a vtk file and then render it. https://youtu.be/H8ZqP3zP3P8 Its pretty cool SU2 runs on arm as well. |
||
August 30, 2022, 13:54 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Bruno Sotelo
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Really weird sensitivity convergence result of SU2 6.2.0 | Kevin_N | SU2 Shape Design | 0 | July 18, 2019 05:00 |
Convergence issues for steady turbulent diffusion flame | stuntmanmike | CFX | 5 | November 7, 2014 18:37 |
best setting for SU2 | mechy | SU2 | 3 | April 20, 2014 20:13 |
Turbulent flat plate validation, incorrect convergence | winter | SU2 | 3 | November 7, 2013 19:17 |
SimpleFoam: Laminar vs. Turbulent Convergence | JasonG | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 2, 2011 09:29 |