CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Boundary conditions for K and Omega in SST model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 3 Post By talbring

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 26, 2017, 13:39
Default Boundary conditions for K and Omega in SST model
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 9
Ryan. is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am using SST turbulence model for my simulations and I would like to know what type of boundary conditions for "K" and "Omega" are applied at different markers. In the config file the boundary conditions for pressure and velocity can be explicitly defined but I could not find any information about the type of boundary conditions used for "K" and "Omega" at the inlet, outlet or at the walls. Can someone please give me some information about the default settings of these BCs?

Thanks in advance.
Ryan. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2017, 05:17
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Tim Albring
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 11
talbring is on a distinguished road
Hi Ryan,

at the inlet k and Omega are computed using the values set with FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY (default 0.05) and FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO (default 10) in the config file.

At the wall k is set to zero and omega is defined as described here:
https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/sst.html

At the outlet the values are extrapolated from the interior.

I hope that helps.

Tim
gbettega, bkay and Ryan. like this.
__________________
Developer Director @ SU2 Foundation

Get involved:
talbring is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2017, 18:29
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 9
Ryan. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by talbring View Post
Hi Ryan,

at the inlet k and Omega are computed using the values set with FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY (default 0.05) and FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO (default 10) in the config file.

At the wall k is set to zero and omega is defined as described here:
https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/sst.html

At the outlet the values are extrapolated from the interior.

I hope that helps.

Tim
Perfect, thanks for the explanations
Ryan. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2021, 21:30
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Sai Darbha
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 8
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 7
sphani4391 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the explanations. I have a few questions regarding the k omega SST turbulence model initialization in a cylindrical nozzle flow with recirculating flow at the outlet caused due to kelvin helmholtz instability at the nozzle exit. I am doing 2D axisymmetric simulations with a wedge BC.



1. How do I set the k, omega BC at outlet to take care of the recirculating flow? I could use inletOutlet with inletValue of 0 for k but that's unphysical.


2. What value of y+ should I ensure near the walls. I am using a wall function for k and omega. My Re=25000, which is a high Re case and I heard that k omega is for Low Re.


3. If I go to a fine mesh with y+ <1, should I switch off the wall function?
sphani4391 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2021, 03:55
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 649
Rep Power: 19
bigfootedrockmidget is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphani4391 View Post
Thanks for the explanations. I have a few questions regarding the k omega SST turbulence model initialization in a cylindrical nozzle flow with recirculating flow at the outlet caused due to kelvin helmholtz instability at the nozzle exit. I am doing 2D axisymmetric simulations with a wedge BC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphani4391 View Post
1. How do I set the k, omega BC at outlet to take care of the recirculating flow? I could use inletOutlet with inletValue of 0 for k but that's unphysical.
recirculating flow at the outlet should be avoided, as there is no way of knowing what kind of flow enters the domain from the outlet into the domain. Currently you cannot set any values for k,omega in case of backflow at the outlet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphani4391 View Post
2. What value of y+ should I ensure near the walls. I am using a wall function for k and omega. My Re=25000, which is a high Re case and I heard that k omega is for Low Re.
"Low Reynolds turbulence models" usually mean that you can (or must) resolve the wall boundary layer. In SU2, this nomenclature is not used. When you use the wall functions, you can use a y+ >5, with best results between y+=[30 - 100]. If you do not use wall functions, y+ should preferably be y+ < 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphani4391 View Post
3. If I go to a fine mesh with y+ <1, should I switch off the wall function?
yes, but this is done automatically when y+<5. That reminds me that I will add a config option to control this parameter.
bigfootedrockmidget is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundaries condition, k-omega, rans modelling, sst k-omega, su2


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 60 July 17, 2024 06:45
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 08:38
Doubt about boundary conditions of k-omega SST model mech_engg_swag OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 March 13, 2016 16:12
Boundary Conditions for k omega SST dancfd OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 June 10, 2011 00:25
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:49.