|
[Sponsors] |
April 8, 2016, 05:25 |
Global CFL Setup
|
#1 |
Member
Paul Zhang
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
Is there a way to use a global CFL, ramping from a small value up to a user defined upper limit, without modifying the code? I feel the a universal physical time step for each cell makes more sense than variant one. Thanks, Paul |
|
April 11, 2016, 13:42 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Heather Kline
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/su2...parameter.html As you can see in the cfd-online entry on the CFL number (http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Coura...Lewy_condition), the CFL number is defined relative to the grid size and so a constant CFL will not necessarily give a constant time step across the mesh. If you would like to use constant time-stepping, you may want to use the unsteady capability. Some examples are in TestCases/unsteady, where you would need to change the UNSTEADY_SIMULATION setting to TIME_STEPPING to get the behavior that I think you are describing. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 14:58 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |