|
[Sponsors] |
Parameters selection option for shape optimization |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 7, 2014, 02:29 |
Parameters selection option for shape optimization
|
#1 |
Member
Sreekanth
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: India
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I see that SU2 has many options for parameter selection, like 1-Hicks_henne ,2 -cosine_bump ...5-Displacement etc.. In the config_template it gives the syntax of each option. But I would like to know what each option does. The SU2 paper talks about Hicks-henne and FFD but nothing about other options. I am interested specially in the displacement option. Can you tell me how it works? Also could you point me to any documentation material regarding this? Sreekanth |
|
February 10, 2014, 12:32 |
Parameters selection option for shape optimization
|
#2 |
Member
Sreekanth
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: India
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
1) I see that SU2 has many options for parameter selection, like 1-Hicks_henne ,2 -cosine_bump ...5-Displacement etc.. In the config_template it gives the syntax of each option. But I would like to know what each option does. The SU2 paper talks about Hicks-henne and FFD but nothing about other options. 2) What does DV_PARAM and DV_VALUE options do? How do you set it for cases other than FFD and HICKS_HENNE? I am interested specially in the displacement option. Can you tell me how it works? Also could you point me to any documentation material regarding this? Sreekanth |
|
February 12, 2014, 22:07 |
|
#3 | ||
Super Moderator
Thomas D. Economon
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi Sreekanth,
Quote:
Quote:
Hope this helps, Tom |
|||
November 6, 2014, 08:59 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Zeno
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
From what I've understood, DV_PARAM is used to specify the design variables for the shape deformation, that, for example, will be used to compute the gradients by a FD or adjoint formulation. Is this correct? On the other hand, the DEFINITION_DV option is used to define the design variables for the optimization routine. Does this include that these variables will be used for the calculation of gradients as well (thus making DV_PARAM redundant) ? What is the main difference between DV_PARAM and DEFINITION_DV? Any help is appreciated, Thanks, Z |
||
November 16, 2016, 09:17 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Marc Frankenbach
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
the Question what is the difference between DV_PARAM and DEFINITION_DV would be of interest for me, too. In this thread it is said that there has to be an entry in DV_PARAM for every control point: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/su2...formation.html Although in all available test cases there is only one control point specified. I want to understand how this works to set the right configurations for an internal multibox problem. Thanks in advance, Marc Frankenbach |
|
December 4, 2016, 01:38 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Heather Kline
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
DV_PARAM is used by the SU2_DEF code in combination with the DV_VALUE, DV_KIND, and DV_MARKER options. These options are automatically populated by the DEFINITION_DV options during the operation of the python scripts, where DV_VALUE is set either by the step size of the gradient evaluation or by the design variable values during an optimization. |
||
December 5, 2016, 11:46 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Marc Frankenbach
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Thank you hlk, this helps a lot.
So I guess the settings for DV_PARAM in the TestCases are dummy presets to avoid the 'Config parameter not found: DV_PARAM' error? |
|
Tags |
parameters |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error message: Insufficient Catalogue Size | Paresh Jain | CFX | 33 | August 16, 2024 06:09 |
Difficulty in calculating angular velocity of Savonius turbine simulation | alfaruk | CFX | 14 | March 17, 2017 07:08 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
about compresive phase | James | CFX | 10 | September 12, 2006 04:16 |
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue | Miguel Baritto | CFX | 4 | August 31, 2006 13:02 |