Massflow rate/area on section plane?!

Maddin · July 30, 2009, 04:51

Knows somebody a trick to realize this?
On boundarys or interfaces it works... but I would like to have it on section planes... support can't help me really... they said wait for 4.04 but there is still the same problem...

f-w · July 30, 2009, 12:48

I don't know if I'm misunderstanding you, but I'm having no problem creating simple or constrained planes under Derived Parts, and using them in a Mass Flow Report.

If you want mass flow per area, then you'll have to create another report, Frontal Area, and calculate the area of your plane.

Maddin · July 30, 2009, 17:34

Hmm I will try. I had created a scalar scene and there I had used the plane as a part and then the scalar function "massflow rate" or "area" and there I didn't get shown something... problem is I need the massflow for each "cell".

f-w · July 30, 2009, 19:01

Yeah, it doesn't look like you can plot that in a scene, but you can still pull this information out from reports when working with section planes.

I haven't tried it, but you should also be able to pull that info out for any cell you want if you create a cell surface in derived parts, and used that instead of planes in reports.

Maddin · July 31, 2009, 09:27

Hmm this don't work. When I make a mass flow report I get some rate but it's different from the rate of the boundary when I make the plane on the boundary.

vishyaroon · July 31, 2009, 12:05

My group has had this problem for quite sometime. As both of you have pointed out this can be easily done in interfaces. However inside a domain, the only way we have done it is (which is tedious, but we had no choice), to define small constraint planes and individually compute the massflow rates through these sections.

We have contacted Adapco and have put forth this request very frequently. But I guess this is a complicated thing to ask for. The interpolation of the neighboring cells onto the plane seems to be the problem which they have to overcome.

vishyaroon · July 31, 2009, 12:31

Well you know what .... thinking about this there is a trick to get out of this. I had tried this sometime back. This however needs some additional post-processing

In the plane where we need the mass flow rates, you can define a Presentation Grid. If you extract the velocities (directional) and the density, you can get the mass flow rates as dA for the presentation grid is a constant. You may not be able to get the area magnitude from STAR CCM+, which is why the presentation grid is very useful.

Hope this helps

Maddin · July 31, 2009, 14:18

No this don't helps because I didn't have the "area" of the cell. The function area also didn't work. Function edge length also don't work.
It would be very nice when adapco would remove all functions which don't work...

Other mass flow problem is on extensions! Their the ccm calculate the wrong area (double!), they said "ok this is a bug we will solve it", I will phone on monday with my Supporter maybe he can give me a hint to solve this problem.

Interfaces sure, but then I have to make a new mesh and I have to run new simulations...

vishyaroon · July 31, 2009, 14:55

Hello Maddin,

You are correct - the functions area and edge lengths do not work. But you know the dimensions of the presentation grid you are generating (as you fix it when you are defining the presentation grid). This will give you your dA.

Regards
Aroon

Maddin · July 31, 2009, 15:34

I know the area of the boundary but I need the massflow/area for each cell...

vishyaroon · July 31, 2009, 16:29

Hello Maddin,

Let me see if I understand. Please see the attached picture which I generated. Is something like this what you are looking for?

The other thing I could have done to get to the point where it looks like what shows up in interfaces or boundaries is that I can multiply this field function that I generated by dA, which we define to get the actual mass flow rates at each of the presentation grid points.

Regards
Aroon

Maddin · August 1, 2009, 07:44

Yeah. But without cell area/size I don't calculate the correct flow rate.
I think I will do some interfaces more and maybe the support can help me.

Maddin · August 3, 2009, 09:48

I think I have a solution.
The planes in my case should have the "same mesh" like the boundarys.
I will try to export the areas for the boundarys and then to use them for my planes. Maybe it works!

vishyaroon · August 3, 2009, 09:54

Well I had shown the mass flow rate per unit area in the figure, plotted on a presentation grid.

The presentation grid has been defined by the user. The user exactly knows the dimensions of the presentation grid, since the user defines the number of grid point in the two dimensions, as well as the extent of the presentation grid. So all that is to be done is to multiply this area (which we know after defining the presentation grid) to the values of the field function that has been plotted (mass flow/area).

July 30, 2009, 04:51	Massflow rate/area on section plane?!	#1
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	Knows somebody a trick to realize this? On boundarys or interfaces it works... but I would like to have it on section planes... support can't help me really... they said wait for 4.04 but there is still the same problem...

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh	nishant_hull	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	23	August 5, 2015 03:09
[Gmsh] boundaries with gmshToFoam‏	ouafa	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	7	May 21, 2010 13:43
plane section passing through an object	sabry	Siemens	6	July 6, 2008 12:31
LiftDrag utility from v12 to v141	cfdphil	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	2	December 5, 2007 06:49
Defining Section Plane from Vset	Cb	Siemens	0	March 4, 2005 05:09

July 30, 2009, 12:48		#2
f-w Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 159 Rep Power: 17	I don't know if I'm misunderstanding you, but I'm having no problem creating simple or constrained planes under Derived Parts, and using them in a Mass Flow Report. If you want mass flow per area, then you'll have to create another report, Frontal Area, and calculate the area of your plane.

July 30, 2009, 17:34		#3
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	Hmm I will try. I had created a scalar scene and there I had used the plane as a part and then the scalar function "massflow rate" or "area" and there I didn't get shown something... problem is I need the massflow for each "cell".

July 30, 2009, 19:01		#4
f-w Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 159 Rep Power: 17	Yeah, it doesn't look like you can plot that in a scene, but you can still pull this information out from reports when working with section planes. I haven't tried it, but you should also be able to pull that info out for any cell you want if you create a cell surface in derived parts, and used that instead of planes in reports.

July 31, 2009, 09:27		#5
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	Hmm this don't work. When I make a mass flow report I get some rate but it's different from the rate of the boundary when I make the plane on the boundary.

July 31, 2009, 12:05		#6
vishyaroon Senior Member Aroon Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Racine WI Posts: 148 Rep Power: 17	My group has had this problem for quite sometime. As both of you have pointed out this can be easily done in interfaces. However inside a domain, the only way we have done it is (which is tedious, but we had no choice), to define small constraint planes and individually compute the massflow rates through these sections. We have contacted Adapco and have put forth this request very frequently. But I guess this is a complicated thing to ask for. The interpolation of the neighboring cells onto the plane seems to be the problem which they have to overcome.

July 31, 2009, 12:31		#7
vishyaroon Senior Member Aroon Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Racine WI Posts: 148 Rep Power: 17	Well you know what .... thinking about this there is a trick to get out of this. I had tried this sometime back. This however needs some additional post-processing In the plane where we need the mass flow rates, you can define a Presentation Grid. If you extract the velocities (directional) and the density, you can get the mass flow rates as dA for the presentation grid is a constant. You may not be able to get the area magnitude from STAR CCM+, which is why the presentation grid is very useful. Hope this helps

July 31, 2009, 14:18		#8
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	No this don't helps because I didn't have the "area" of the cell. The function area also didn't work. Function edge length also don't work. It would be very nice when adapco would remove all functions which don't work... Other mass flow problem is on extensions! Their the ccm calculate the wrong area (double!), they said "ok this is a bug we will solve it", I will phone on monday with my Supporter maybe he can give me a hint to solve this problem. Interfaces sure, but then I have to make a new mesh and I have to run new simulations...

July 31, 2009, 14:55		#9
vishyaroon Senior Member Aroon Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Racine WI Posts: 148 Rep Power: 17	Hello Maddin, You are correct - the functions area and edge lengths do not work. But you know the dimensions of the presentation grid you are generating (as you fix it when you are defining the presentation grid). This will give you your dA. Regards Aroon

July 31, 2009, 15:34		#10
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	I know the area of the boundary but I need the massflow/area for each cell...

August 1, 2009, 07:44		#12
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	Yeah. But without cell area/size I don't calculate the correct flow rate. I think I will do some interfaces more and maybe the support can help me.

August 3, 2009, 09:48		#13
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	I think I have a solution. The planes in my case should have the "same mesh" like the boundarys. I will try to export the areas for the boundarys and then to use them for my planes. Maybe it works!

August 3, 2009, 09:54		#14
vishyaroon Senior Member Aroon Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Racine WI Posts: 148 Rep Power: 17	Well I had shown the mass flow rate per unit area in the figure, plotted on a presentation grid. The presentation grid has been defined by the user. The user exactly knows the dimensions of the presentation grid, since the user defines the number of grid point in the two dimensions, as well as the extent of the presentation grid. So all that is to be done is to multiply this area (which we know after defining the presentation grid) to the values of the field function that has been plotted (mass flow/area).