|
[Sponsors] |
December 22, 2021, 08:02 |
question about CFL number
|
#1 |
Member
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello,
I can't understand conceptually how Star-CCM+ allows to set any arbitrary CFL number (Courant number under solvers) for the coupled implicit solver. I already have a grid (so a Dx) and I already set a time step (Dt). I also have a flow velocity over the domain (u). So the CFL number should already be defined as CFL = u*Dx/Dt What happens when I set an arbitrary CFL (e.g. 50)? It doesn't seem that my time step gets overwritten, and for sure the grid and flow velocity do not either... Thank you Pietro |
|
December 22, 2021, 08:03 |
|
#2 |
Member
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5 |
I meant
CFL = u*Dt/Dx |
|
December 22, 2021, 21:54 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66 |
It is a dual-time marching scheme. The dt you specify is the global physical time specified across all cells but under-the-hood you are taking multiple pseudo time-steps at each individual cell all converging at different rates to eventually arrive at the solution at the physical time across all cells that you specify. The relative size of the underlying pseudo/virtual steps is controlled by the Courant number. This is property of coupled/density-based solvers. If you notice, you don't specify how many iterations are performed at each time-step like you would in a segregated flow solver.
|
|
December 23, 2021, 12:59 |
|
#4 |
Member
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5 |
Ok, makes sense, even though you still specify the number of inner iterations for each time step. I have found now some more info on the user guide under 'implicit unsteady'.
Thank you! |
|
Tags |
cfl number, courant number, stability analysis, star ccm+ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Decomposing meshes | Tobi | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 22 | February 24, 2023 10:23 |
SimpleFoam & Theater | jipai | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | June 18, 2019 11:11 |
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel | Pj. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 23, 2015 15:53 |
decomposePar pointfield | flying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | December 30, 2013 16:05 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |