CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

question about CFL number

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 22, 2021, 08:02
Default question about CFL number
  #1
Member
 
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5
pi120 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I can't understand conceptually how Star-CCM+ allows to set any arbitrary CFL number (Courant number under solvers) for the coupled implicit solver.

I already have a grid (so a Dx) and I already set a time step (Dt). I also have a flow velocity over the domain (u). So the CFL number should already be defined as

CFL = u*Dx/Dt

What happens when I set an arbitrary CFL (e.g. 50)? It doesn't seem that my time step gets overwritten, and for sure the grid and flow velocity do not either...

Thank you
Pietro
pi120 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2021, 08:03
Default
  #2
Member
 
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5
pi120 is on a distinguished road
I meant

CFL = u*Dt/Dx
pi120 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2021, 21:54
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
It is a dual-time marching scheme. The dt you specify is the global physical time specified across all cells but under-the-hood you are taking multiple pseudo time-steps at each individual cell all converging at different rates to eventually arrive at the solution at the physical time across all cells that you specify. The relative size of the underlying pseudo/virtual steps is controlled by the Courant number. This is property of coupled/density-based solvers. If you notice, you don't specify how many iterations are performed at each time-step like you would in a segregated flow solver.
pi120 likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2021, 12:59
Default
  #4
Member
 
Pietro
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: London
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5
pi120 is on a distinguished road
Ok, makes sense, even though you still specify the number of inner iterations for each time step. I have found now some more info on the user guide under 'implicit unsteady'.
Thank you!
pi120 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfl number, courant number, stability analysis, star ccm+


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decomposing meshes Tobi OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 22 February 24, 2023 10:23
SimpleFoam & Theater jipai OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 18, 2019 11:11
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel Pj. OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 April 23, 2015 15:53
decomposePar pointfield flying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 28 December 30, 2013 16:05
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 10:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:35.