|
[Sponsors] |
October 8, 2018, 04:15 |
Pressure differences
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 15 |
I have calculated a water jacket (helix), with a viscous liquid. I observed that the difference of static pressure (from entry to exit) is greater than the difference of the total pressure between the same interfaces. Does anybody know why?
Thanks a lot |
|
October 8, 2018, 05:22 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Total pressure drop represent pressure loss ( total energy loss) in your system whereas static pressure drop represent static pressure difference between inlet and outlet. If you have same c/s area at measuring c/s then static pressure drop should be similar to total pressure drop. If your outlet c/s area is lesser than inlet, then it means some of static pressure head is converted into velocity head. That's why you have more velocity at outlet than that of inlet (Mass is conserved). In this case, static pressure drop will be more than total pressure drop. If c/s area at outlet is more than inlet, some velocity head (kinetic energy head) gets converted to pressure head. In this case, total pressure drop will be positive but static pressure drop can be positive, negative or zero. (zero static pressure drop will be a beautiful case when pressure loss will be equal to conversion kinetic energy head to pressure head) Please note- Static pressure head = pressure head Velocity head = kinetic energy head So, Total pressure = Static pressure + velocity head(dynamic component) Hope this helps. |
||
October 8, 2018, 08:17 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 15 |
Thank you for your fast answer. I have a case where the inlet and outlet area are the same. Is there a physical explanation why the static pressure difference is greater than the total pressure difference?
|
|
October 9, 2018, 02:55 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Can you give brief info about your case. May be a rough sketch will help. Edit1: Something strikes me. I think if there is a reverse flow at outlet then this may happen. Not so sure though. Also if the values (Total and Static) are very near then it can be a numerical error of CFD. Last edited by ashokac7; October 10, 2018 at 03:02. |
||
October 10, 2018, 05:30 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 15 |
I simulated a horizontal channel. The entry and exit has the same area.
The fluid is a liquid with constant density. Viscosity is considered, gravity not. The static pressure difference is 1 mbar greater than the absolute total pressure difference |
|
October 10, 2018, 10:15 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Ok. Now I am confused too. I read in CCM guide that for incompressible flow without gravity and without turbulence, Static pressure drop should be equal to Total pressure drop. So can you run the same model with laminar flow, and check the values. Let me know. In case of turbulence, total pressure = working pressure + dynamic pressure. Where, working pressure = static pressure + 2/3(rho*k) K is turbulent kinetic energy. So what i think is. If turbulence is more on outlet than at inlet, then total pressure at outlet will be somewhat more than what we get at outlet in laminar flow. So Total pressure drop will be lesser. I hope you get this. We can discuss if needed. |
||
October 10, 2018, 17:35 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
Quote:
Static pressure and total pressure are local fields (i.e. functions of x,y,z). There's not 1 value of static and total pressure at your inlet and exit and there's certainly not 1 value of the difference between inlet and outlet. It should be a field. Obviously you've taken some type of macroscopic spatial average. The averaging process introduces skew. |
||
October 10, 2018, 17:49 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
Whoops, wrong thread.
|
|
October 15, 2018, 03:55 |
|
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 15 |
||
Tags |
pressure difference, static pressure, total pressure |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind tunnel Boundary Conditions in Fluent | metmet | FLUENT | 6 | October 30, 2019 13:23 |
pisoFOAM (LES) - internal pipe flow - convergence | gu1 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 11, 2018 17:39 |
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent | nusivares | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | December 12, 2017 06:35 |
Outlet pressure | aja1345 | FLUENT | 5 | August 18, 2015 12:02 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |