CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Base Size

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By alw7
  • 1 Post By me3840
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 13, 2018, 12:48
Default Base Size
  #1
New Member
 
Indiana (IN)
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8
alw7 is on a distinguished road
Good morning!

How do you determine your base size, target surface size, and maximum cell size?

Thank you!
sfdhchg likes this.
alw7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2018, 20:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25
me3840 is on a distinguished road
The base size should almost always be the size of the largest surface edge length you want in your mesh.

Leave the target surface size in default values at 100%, and make surface controls for anything you want finer.

Determining if your mesh is fine enough is subject to experience and mesh refinement studies.
sfdhchg likes this.
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2018, 14:08
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
It's helpful to understand the relationship between base cell size, target cell size, and maximum cell size in the Star-CCM interface because of how prevalent relative cell sizing should be.

The delta/10 rule is a good and almost universal rule-of-thumb. That is, any feature you want resolved should have 10 cells across it's dimension. You should go into meshing with some delta/# in mind. If you don't, you should experiment to get this experience.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2018, 08:13
Default
  #4
Member
 
André Pinto
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 9
AndreP is on a distinguished road
My "rule of thumb" to START meshing (before refinements that I find necessary) are:

Body/Flat plates no bigger than 100% of base size for Target.

Round surfaces I normally assign the minimum cell size of Half the radius of that surface!

As I said, this is a starting point. After this I analyse the mesh (mesh indicators and I look at the mesh to search for good resolution), and refine more areas that I need!
AndreP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2018, 17:10
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
The base cell size almost be set to just about any number because it's just a reference value. If you use absolute values in target surface size and minimum cell sizes then the base size is almost irrelevant because it's never needed. If you use relative sizes (which is the default) then the absolute sizes are calculated automatically using the % you give and the base size.

There is one exception, the minimum prism layer threshold is a % of the base size and there is a smallest possible value that Star will let you enter this percentage. In my opinion this is a bug in Star.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreP View Post
Round surfaces I normally assign the minimum cell size of Half the radius of that surface!
Note that there is a meshing option in Star-CCM labeled # pts / circle which helps to enforce this condition. Star always chooses the tighter constraint. It takes the smaller of the target cell size and the calculated cell size using the # pts / circle. But it will not generate cells smaller than the minimum cell size.
Matthew Huang likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cell size, maximum size, target size


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Effect of globle mesh size and mesh independency sujay ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 20 September 29, 2019 08:36
[mesh manipulation] How to write cellSet for different regions in constant/polyMesh/sets Struggle_Achieve OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 June 17, 2019 10:29
[ANSYS Meshing] Meaning of max size, min size, max face size, mesh sensitivity Tanjina ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 December 7, 2013 21:59
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 11, 2007 00:23
Size Function (Gambit) Eric R. FLUENT 0 November 4, 2002 13:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:44.