CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Generation of Vof Waves

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By asubram8

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 25, 2018, 22:26
Default Generation of Vof Waves
  #1
New Member
 
Akshith Subramanian
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
asubram8 is on a distinguished road
Hi All,
I have been trying to simulate the flow of waves over a spherical body as a project. For the numerical wave tank I have chosen a velocity inlet boundary condition for inlet, pressure outlet for the outlet and top. Bottom and far field are walls and I am using a symmetry plane. I have defined the inlet velocity and outlet pressure in terms of field functions of the waves. However I can see on the volume fraction scalar that there is a water build-up in the system.


Can anyone give me any ideas on what could be going wrong?
TIA
Akshith
hamedha1371 likes this.
asubram8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2018, 09:42
Smile
  #2
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 11
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
Quote:
Originally Posted by asubram8 View Post
Hi All,
I have been trying to simulate the flow of waves over a spherical body as a project. For the numerical wave tank I have chosen a velocity inlet boundary condition for inlet, pressure outlet for the outlet and top. Bottom and far field are walls and I am using a symmetry plane. I have defined the inlet velocity and outlet pressure in terms of field functions of the waves. However I can see on the volume fraction scalar that there is a water build-up in the system.


Can anyone give me any ideas on what could be going wrong?
TIA
Akshith
This is like inherited problem with VOF. To end up getting wrong volumes of phases. You may try to play with mesh or physical set up. But exact Eulerian multi-phase will give more accurate solution, which is as we know, on cost of more computational resource. But Eulerian multi-phase will provide data to compare your VOF results. So you can adjust the VOF results accordingly.
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2018, 20:11
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Akshith Subramanian
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
asubram8 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashokac7 View Post
This is like inherited problem with VOF. To end up getting wrong volumes of phases. You may try to play with mesh or physical set up. But exact Eulerian multi-phase will give more accurate solution, which is as we know, on cost of more computational resource. But Eulerian multi-phase will provide data to compare your VOF results. So you can adjust the VOF results accordingly.

I am using a Eulerian Multiphase model. I can still see the increase in volume fraction of water. I personally feel this is a problem with the physics set-up as I did refine the mesh and make it coarse near the outlet so as to damp wave reflections into the system.
Any further comments?


TIA
Akshith
asubram8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2018, 21:59
Default
  #4
HHK
Member
 
HHK's Avatar
 
HARIHARAN K
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12
HHK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by asubram8 View Post
I have been trying to simulate the flow of waves over a spherical body as a project. For the numerical wave tank I have chosen a velocity inlet boundary condition for inlet, pressure outlet for the outlet and top. Bottom and far field are walls and I am using a symmetry plane. I have defined the inlet velocity and outlet pressure in terms of field functions of the waves. However I can see on the volume fraction scalar that there is a water build-up in the system.
Do you mind posting some pictures? I just want to see.
HHK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2018, 18:28
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Akshith Subramanian
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
asubram8 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by HHK View Post
Do you mind posting some pictures? I just want to see.
Hi

Sorry for the delayed response.
This is how my volume fraction scene looks like before the run and after.volume_fraction_initialization.jpg

volume_fraction_after_run.jpg
asubram8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2018, 18:31
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Akshith Subramanian
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
asubram8 is on a distinguished road
Do you have any suggestions as to what could be the problem? I have tried various meshing techniques and even used Ansys Workbench for meshing. The problem still seems to be there and it looks like something is wrong with the way I am defining my physics conditions.
asubram8 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2018, 05:06
Default Hi
  #7
HHK
Member
 
HHK's Avatar
 
HARIHARAN K
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 12
HHK is on a distinguished road
Hi

I believe you are using VOF model.
My comments are (which come to my mind now),

1. Why the top and bottom boundaries are nearer to the sphere? Did you trying increasing them? (At least the depth).

2. If you are using first order (or fifth order wave), how many layers of cells did you keep to refine the wave height and wave length? I recommend to go for 40 layers cells per wave height and 80 layers of cells per wave length.

3. Is the sphere submerged at the starting point? I hope you set the water level in VOF Waves module correctly.

4. Are you using DFBI module to analyse the motions or the sphere is fixed? If you are using DFBI, are the initial values of rigid body properly set?

5. How did you choose you time-step? Is it 2nd order accurate? I recommend to choose 1/200th of your wave period.

Hope this helps.
HHK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2018, 06:07
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Raquel
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
raquelcfd is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Have you tried to change the boundary conditions?
I mean, It is usually to use the velocity inlet conditions in de inlet but also in the laterals of the tank and in the top side. Then use the wall condition in the botton and pressure outlet for the outlet.
raquelcfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2018, 11:36
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Hamed
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
hamedha1371 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by asubram8 View Post
Hi All,
I have been trying to simulate the flow of waves over a spherical body as a project. For the numerical wave tank I have chosen a velocity inlet boundary condition for inlet, pressure outlet for the outlet and top. Bottom and far field are walls and I am using a symmetry plane. I have defined the inlet velocity and outlet pressure in terms of field functions of the waves. However I can see on the volume fraction scalar that there is a water build-up in the system.


Can anyone give me any ideas on what could be going wrong?
TIA
Akshith
Hello there. use wave damping at the outlet. set the damping length to be at least one wavelength. your tank should be long enough so that the sphere won't be in the damping area. try it and let me know if it works! good luck
hamedha1371 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAVES GENERATION IN A PORT OR BRAKE WAVES. important tecnicaf1 STAR-CCM+ 1 May 27, 2011 08:32
VOF waves breaking in my simulation mbn1454 STAR-CCM+ 4 December 12, 2010 05:27
Following waves generation Nico Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2006 09:28
WAVES with VOF Panayotis Prinos FLUENT 1 December 17, 2000 18:58
Propagation of Waves with VOF Panayotis Prinos FLUENT 0 December 7, 2000 07:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:58.