CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

k-omega or k-epsilon ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By me3840

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 11, 2016, 13:21
Post k-omega or k-epsilon ?
  #1
Member
 
Dennis
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10
dennis722 is on a distinguished road
I am simulating a fsae car. First I have simulated it with the realizable K-Epsilon Two-Layer with exact wall distance and two-layer all y+ wall treatment. Second i have simulated the car with the K-Omega SST Turbulence with exact wall distance and all y+ wall treatment.

My y+ goes from 1 to about 20 and i took the exact same mesh for both simulations.

With the k-epsilon i got the following values: Cl=-0.575 (Fl=-191.65N) and Cd=0.372 (Fd=124.05N)

And with k-omega i got: Cl=-0.524 (Fl=-174.49N) and Cd=0.358 (Fd=119.35N)

To that i have to say the the convergence of the k-epsilon was better it converged after about 1000 iterations and the k-omega doesn't really converged after 4200 iterations.

I have read, about different models and every it says that the k-omega is better for seperated flows and so better for getting the right lift and drag values.

I don't know which model should know be right or better..

Thank you
dennis722 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 11, 2016, 15:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Munich
Posts: 144
Rep Power: 13
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hi Dennis,

You are right, k-omega model is better for separated flows, should be used at high velocity, needs more number of prism layers for near wall resolution.

However I recommend you to use k-e with all wall treatment model for fsae applications since fsae cars don't traverse at very high speeds.
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 11, 2016, 17:19
Default
  #3
Member
 
Dennis
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10
dennis722 is on a distinguished road
Ok and what is the best range for the y+ with k-epsilon all wall treatment model to get lift and drag values that are near the real values in a windtunnel.
I have read different ranges for y+ with this model...
And how would you set the prism layers and mesh size for best results?

Thank you
dennis722 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2016, 03:23
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Gajendra Gulgulia
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Munich
Posts: 144
Rep Power: 13
ggulgulia is on a distinguished road
Hello Dennis,


Regarding Y+ values, I suggest you to read this thread:

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/sta...-question.html

Regarding Mesh size, I cannot really tell you until I understand how your CFD domain is, what features you are looking to resolve so on and so forth.
ggulgulia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2016, 07:55
Default
  #5
Member
 
Dennis
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10
dennis722 is on a distinguished road
I am simulating an external flow and want to get the lift and drag values. Moreover I need to know where the centre of the pressure force is. Also I need to know when the flow separates of a wing and I need the pressure around the car.

I think because of the lift and drag values I have to set a fine mesh and a y+ around 1. Or is that wrong?
dennis722 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2016, 21:19
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25
me3840 is on a distinguished road
I would recommend k-omega SST over k-epsilon for external aero applications like this. Separation prediction is better. For important surfaces (wings, tires if you can afford the mesh, floor plates) use y+=1. Otherwise stick to 30<=y+<=100 or so.

On important surfaces you will want at least 10 prisms or so, more if you can afford it. On less important things you can stick with 5 or so.

FSAE cars are somewhat small, but a mesh of ~20M cells or so will do okay. More if you can afford it is better, obviously. Aero simulations are very expensive, so you need to do what you can with what computing power you have.
dennis722 likes this.
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
convergence, k-epsilon k-omega, methods, model, solver


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 March 4, 2017 09:30
epsilon and omega free stream BC's immortality OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 September 10, 2013 04:38
problem from k epsilon to k omega NJG OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 15, 2013 09:24
why omega instead of epsilon in turbulence modeling pgoyal10 Main CFD Forum 1 May 5, 2012 12:02
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 21:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25.