|
[Sponsors] |
April 22, 2023, 12:18 |
Steady flow in flume test
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrex
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3 |
Hello everyone,
I used the flume test to do my experiments under steady flow. After I completed it, I am trying to use REEF3D to simulate the experiments. I have problems and hope everyone helps. 1. Using the reduced area for REEF3D is reasonable? (Please see the attached figure below) 2. To use the steady flow in REEF3D: The velocity was calculated at the center of the water section (for experiments = 0.28 (m/s)). In REEF3D, to declare the velocity compatible with the experiment, I used W 10 and B 60 parameters to do it, for example, W 10 0.056 (0.056 = 0.28 x water depth x flume width), is it right? (Please see the attached figure below). Thank all Andrex |
|
April 22, 2023, 21:18 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Rohan Jha
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 |
Hey! REEF3D does have the capability to model ramps etc., to be used in the NWT (see the command S 61 in the Divemesh guide), so if you want to, you can re-create your flume in REEF3D.
I am not 100% sure about the validity, but as far as I know, it depends on your model's dimensions and how comparable it is to the NWT dimension. But since it's a steady flow problem with a very gentle slope, it might be fine. I would still suggest increasing your domain length to include the ramp in your NWT and some distance. Coming to W 10, that is evaluated in the way you have mentioned. |
|
April 22, 2023, 23:36 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Andrex
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3 |
Hi rohanjha,
Thank you for your response. In my experiment, the sediment domain was just set up 1.2m in length ( excluding ramps), and the dimension of my model is solid cubic 0.1x0.1x0.1 m and is in the center of the sediment domain. The Vectrino profiler (to calculate the flow velocity) starts at flat sediment. The width and height of the flume tank are 0.5m and 0.6m respectively. As my experiment was set up, the NWT dimension in REEF3D will be 1.2m x 0.5 x 0.6m (length, width, height). Is it right and reasonable? (As you said that increasing the length of the domain including the ramp but at the front of the ramp I do not have data for velocity.) Many thank |
|
April 25, 2023, 12:10 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Rohan Jha
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 |
Quote:
|
||
April 26, 2023, 22:48 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Andrex
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 3 |
Hi Rohan Jha,
Thank you for your response. I will try lengths is 0.6 m and 0.8m Many thank. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intuition for why flow follows convex surfaces | lopp | Main CFD Forum | 47 | February 1, 2022 14:14 |
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow | Jing | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 5, 2018 18:02 |
flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 8 | August 11, 2015 14:00 |
i need the best setup and setting for compressible flow test | bluAero | FLUENT | 4 | March 20, 2013 18:19 |
Unsteady AND Steady mode for Fully Developped Flow | Dominique | FLUENT | 5 | April 16, 2004 18:58 |