|
[Sponsors] |
Non-conformal mesh interface and Pointwise |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 12, 2017, 13:44 |
Non-conformal mesh interface and Pointwise
|
#1 |
New Member
|
Is there a way to create a non-conformal mesh interface in pointwise?
I am trying to run a transient simulation for my horizontal axis wind turbine model using sliding mesh method but it seems that fluent solver has some issues with the conformal interface between the rotating cylinder and the enclosure resulting in creating a negative volume cells that cause the solver to fail. I tried to double and separate the interface domains or connectors but I failed even if I separate cylinder and enclosure in two layers. Any suggestions! |
|
June 12, 2017, 18:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Rick Matus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
As far as I know, Fluent does not care if the meshes on a sliding interface are conformal or not, but I'll leave that to a Fluent expert.
To answer your Pointwise question, you do not need to create two domains at the sliding interface. Instead, go to the CAE, Set BCs menu, and change both sides of the sliding interface domains to type interface. When you export the Fluent CAE file, they will automatically be split into separate zones. If you truly want to make a non-conformal interface, you will have to make some change to the grid on one side of the interface so the two sides are not identical. One way to do that is to change the number of grid points on one side. Just copy the interface domain, paste, and then redimension while still on the paste panel before saving. |
|
June 12, 2017, 18:26 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
|
Quote:
I 90% believe that the cause of the negative volume message I receive when running sliding mesh method is the contact interface. I am sure of that because I had the same problem last year before I start working on pointwise. I was using Ansys meshing and when redefining the interface as a non-conformal, I solved the problem. I tried your suggestion (copy, past and redimension while still on the paste panel) but still doesn't work. The interface domains I just copied doesn't appear in the domain list. However, in the message panel, it seems the domains have successfully been copied. |
||
June 12, 2017, 18:37 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Rick Matus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
Did the total number of domains and connectors change after you copied and pasted the domain? Just to be clear, when you redimension the copied domain you have to give it a different number of grid points than the original domain.
Pointiwse does not allow identical domains to exit in the same location, so it will merge the two domains back together if they are identical. |
|
June 12, 2017, 18:42 |
|
#5 |
New Member
|
It works now.
Sorry, I just forgot to press the dimension button before pressing oK. Thanks for your time! |
|
June 12, 2017, 18:44 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Rick Matus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 17 |
Glad to hear it worked.
|
|
May 18, 2018, 11:28 |
non-conformal interface
|
#7 |
New Member
kemin ali
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: london
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 11 |
In Fluent, non-conformal interface is need for sliding mesh.
you can mesh the inner rotating domain and outer stationary domain respectively ( 1 physical surface, but two domains) in Pointwise. |
|
Tags |
non-conformal interface, pointwise, sliding mesh method, transient solver |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3D Sliding Mesh Interface | Tauseef | FLUENT | 0 | August 4, 2016 11:00 |
Pointwise Mesh to Fluent Multiblock Issue | NeroBlade | Pointwise & Gridgen | 7 | February 1, 2016 12:07 |
Volume mesh for Cyclone separator | Rajan | Pointwise & Gridgen | 17 | May 4, 2014 06:38 |
[Commercial meshers] Native OpenFOAM interface in Pointwise | cnsidero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 41 | May 20, 2012 19:30 |
Native OpenFOAM interface in Pointwise | Chris Sideroff | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 16, 2009 13:37 |