|
[Sponsors] |
April 19, 2011, 16:03 |
Species mass flow rate
|
#1 |
Member
N. A.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello All,
I am trying to calculate the average mass flow rate of a particular species passing through a plane in the geometry, such as mass flow rate of CO2 passing through a plane. Can you please let me know if know how we can extract this information in paraview. Is there a way to calcualte this value directly in OpenFOAM Thanks, Nir |
|
November 14, 2012, 19:16 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Hi,
your post is old and you just made four posts so I think none will answer me. Do you find out how that works? If someone can explain it, it would be very good for me and all the others Tobi |
|
November 15, 2012, 05:16 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Tobi,
How are you? I think I may be able to help you on this one. The most easy way to do this with paraView would be to calculate the total mass flow through a plane using Y_CO2*rho*U_n where U_n is the velocity component normal to the plane of interest and Y_CO2 is the mass fraction of CO2. If you have a plane not aligned with x, y or z, you can use the calculator filter or the surface flow filter to get the velocity components perpendicular to that plane. Make sure the calculator for rho*U_n works on the cell data. Than go to filters>integrate Variables and you will get a table with the integral Y_CO2*rho*U*dA over Area A. This is the mass of CO2 passing through the area. I do not have an example for doing this during the calculation, but I think something can be done with swak4Foam. Regards, Tom |
|
November 15, 2012, 12:48 |
|
#4 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
I am fine. I have two weeks left to finish my masterthesis. Did you follow the libOpenSmoke thread? I find some fatal bugs in the tool and will bring out my updated model after I finished my thesis. So I think in 4 Weeks everything is avaiable (maybe + validation and description). To tool is very nice but there are some problems with the enthalpie. But I solved it Thanks for your replay. I am too stupid But I test it in the thermolibrary. therefor I ll create a new scalarField and will calculate the CO-emission in PPM directly. I think it should be possible and then I can compare it. Tobi |
||
November 16, 2012, 04:32 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
|
Hi Tobi,
Yes I did follow the libOpenSmoke thread, looks like you have some interesting results! Quote:
good luck Tom |
||
November 16, 2012, 10:54 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Hi Tom,
just one question, if I make everything correct. I wanna calculate CO in ppm on a patch. Therefor I calculate the Mean molmass with: M_aver = sum(Y_i / M_i) of CO, O2, H2O, N2, CO2, H2, OH After that I calculate CO in ppm like: COppm = M_aver/M_CO * Y_CO * 1.000.000 Well the temperature profil looks better with OpenFOAM compared with ansys but if I look to the CO emissions there is so a huge difference: Measurement 80 ppm Ansys 60 ppm OF 0.0013 ppm I am not sure if I make everything correct! |
|
November 19, 2012, 06:53 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I would think you have: M_aver = sum(Y_i * M_i)/sum (Y_i) = sum(Y_i * M_i) and I agree with your calculation of COppm. Regards, Tom Last edited by tomf; November 19, 2012 at 06:54. Reason: typo |
||
November 19, 2012, 08:11 |
|
#9 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
thanks for your replay. I made a validation of my COppm calculation like I mentioned in the last post and its correct, like you told me In that case I realized a other bug in the thermodynamics but in my thesis there is no time for it. Maybe its a problem with the flameletgeneration. Tobi |
||
December 3, 2012, 18:45 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Wouter van der Meer
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Elahuizen, Netherlands
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 18 |
Hello,
Maybe a stupid thing to ask someone that is working on a thesis, but is ppm for gasses not volume based instead of mass based? best regards Wouter |
|
December 3, 2012, 19:29 |
|
#11 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
ppm on (maybe) the species CO is based on the mol fraction [X_CO] * 1.000.000 = CO_ppm. If you wanna get an information on a slice its better to make a mass weighted calculation to get the better result. If you wanna get an information on a specified volume you should do a volume weighted calculation. If I am wrong please correct me. Greetings Tobi |
||
January 20, 2016, 13:03 |
|
#12 | |
Senior Member
Thomas Oliveira
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Best wishes, Thomas |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Match Pressure Inlet/Outlet Boundary Condition Mass Flow Rate | MSchneid | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | February 23, 2019 07:00 |
Shape Optimization Problem of Mass Flow Rate | ggc1991 | SU2 Shape Design | 1 | December 1, 2016 21:24 |
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet | Mike_Tom | CFX | 6 | September 29, 2016 02:27 |
DPM total mass flow rate | yow | FLUENT | 0 | July 17, 2015 13:01 |
Periodic channel flow with time dependent mass flow rate | QBeast | FLUENT | 3 | May 10, 2013 14:14 |