CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

High radiation values with externalwallheatflux

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By mezomatic

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 11, 2024, 03:15
Default High radiation values with externalwallheatflux
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13
mezomatic is on a distinguished road
Hi there,
I have a case that I can't share in it's entirety but it's not really complex.
Basically it's a large electrical component in a very large room (warehouse), that releases heat (69 kW overall). The boundary condition i've used for the component is externalWallHeatFluxTemperature, see the following definition:

Code:
    
     electrical_component
    {
        type            externalWallHeatFluxTemperature;
        mode            power;
        Q               69000;
        kappaMethod     fluidThermo;
        kappa           none;
        value           $internalField;
    }

I've run two simulations with buoyantSimpleFoam (realizeable k-epsilon model) as a first test of the case. One with radiation turned on (fvDOM), one with radiation off, leaving everything else untouched.
I've gotten some reasonable results flowwise (in both cases the results look quite similar) but the temperatures between the two cases differ a lot. I've tracked the mean temperature inside the room over the tiemsteps and in the radiation case it converges to about 90°C, in the case without radiation it converges to about 60 °C.

Then I've checked the heat fluxes over the components patch with the wallHeatFlux utility and integrated them in paraView to see if they matched the 69 kW I specified in the BC.

In the simulation without radiation it looks quite good:
wallHeatFlux_no radiation.jpg

In the other simulation including radiation I was a bit surprised about the really high values:
wallHeatFlux_with radiation.jpg
Somehow it's now 1,3 MW heat coming off the patch. But if you add the -1,28 MW from qr (radiative flux) you end up with 69 kW as the difference.

So it seems like the 69 kW specified in the BC is a 100% convective heat load and in the case of activated radiation, there is a huge amount of radiative heat added to that (I've also got very high surface temperature in both cases of over 800 °C mean surface temp, when it should be somewhere around 200 °C more or less. The resulting mean heat transfer coefficient is 2,3 W/m²K in both cases, which seems a bit low).

Now my questions are:
1. Why is the surface temperature that high?
2. Is there a way to specify the total heat load (convective and radiative) and let OF sort out the proportion? (That's what I thought it would do...)

Thanks in advance!
Let me know if you need any more info...
mezomatic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2024, 04:09
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Yann
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,177
Rep Power: 27
Yann will become famous soon enough
Hello,

I don't know if it will solve your issue, but you need to specify the name of the radiative field in the boundary condition definition. If not, it is not taken into account in the condition: https://doc.openfoam.com/2306/tools/...uxTemperature/

Code:
Property	Description			Type	Required	Default
qr		Name of radiative field		word	no		none
I hope this helps,
Yann
Yann is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2024, 15:47
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13
mezomatic is on a distinguished road
Hey Yann, thanks for the hint. I didn’t think it was necessary, but I‘ll try another run with the radiative field specified.
Yann likes this.
mezomatic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 16, 2024, 14:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13
mezomatic is on a distinguished road
ok if i only add

Code:
qr				qr;
to the externalWallHeatFlux BC then the simulation blows up in the second timestep because of negative temperatures:

Code:
[1] --> FOAM FATAL ERROR: (openfoam-2306)
[1] Negative initial temperature T0: -34760.71479
mezomatic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2024, 05:08
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Yann
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,177
Rep Power: 27
Yann will become famous soon enough
You might want to try some relaxation, and/or the limitTemperature fvOptions.
Yann is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airfoil with simpleFoam and kOmegaSST: high drag values? Tsiolkovsky OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 November 21, 2018 05:56
limit high velocity values riesotto OpenFOAM 7 July 25, 2016 14:28
Radiation Modeling Chris89 CFX 20 August 14, 2014 07:51
High values of heat transfer coefficient for laminar flow in pipe Allankey CFX 2 May 28, 2014 12:44
Modeling both radiation and convection on surfaces - Ansys Transient Thermal R13 s.mishra ANSYS 0 March 31, 2012 04:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:44.