CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

buoyantPimpleFoam vs. Oliveira and Issa paper

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By MaryBau

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 25, 2018, 15:00
Default buoyantPimpleFoam vs. Oliveira and Issa paper
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 16
MaryBau is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I was comparing buoyantPimpleFoam (and buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam) to the Oliveira and Issa paper (Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B, 40: 473-493, 2001). If I understand correctly, buoyantPimpleFoam follows the "Variant 2" explained on that paper because of the order the equations are solved. It does UEq.H, then TEq.H and then pEq.H...Is that correct?

Then, according to the paper:
Quote:
Variant 2 did not perform well, a plausible cause being the fact that the
temperature prediction is based on a velocity field which does not satisfy
continuity
Am I missing something or why does buoyantPimpleFoam solve TEq.H before pEq.H ?

Thanks,
Mary
fumiya likes this.
MaryBau is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:52.