|
[Sponsors] |
OpenFOAM or OpenFOAM+ for large clusters? Inter-Compatibility? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Ronith Stanly
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
I would like to get some suggestions as to which one (OpenFOAM v4.1 or OpenFOAM v1612+) should be installed on a large supercomputing cluster?
1)Which one is easier to be maintained on the cluster? 2)Are both of them compatible with each other? Is it possible to compile the code made on one on the other one too? Is it possible to open a case made on the other? 3)Based on the features/solvers which one is preferred for a large variety of users? I did get some idea about OpenFOAM and OpenFOAM+ from here: https://sites.google.com/site/olafoa...oamenvironment But that does not answer my concern. So please share your suggestions. Thanks, Ronith Stanly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
khedar
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
1) Should be no difference since both have basically the same core.
2) Yes 3) I use OpenFOAM v4.1 but see no reason not to use the other one. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
compatibility condition, openfoam 1612, openfoam 4.1 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM Training Jan-Jul 2017, Virtual, London, Houston, Berlin | CFDFoundation | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | January 4, 2017 06:15 |
OpenFOAM Foundation releases OpenFOAMŪ 3.0.0 | CFDFoundation | OpenFOAM Announcements from OpenFOAM Foundation | 1 | November 7, 2015 15:16 |
[Salome] Salome 6.5 - OpenFoam 2.1.1 Compatibility | Isopar | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 19, 2012 04:20 |
New wiki page: Compatibility Matrix of OpenFOAM vs third party applications | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | April 27, 2012 15:05 |
Compatibility OpenFOAM 1.6 and 1.7.1 | Ale_galleria | OpenFOAM | 2 | September 20, 2010 09:14 |