|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between mass-flow inlet and velocity inlet |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 13, 2016, 07:00 |
Difference between mass-flow inlet and velocity inlet
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,
I am using Simflow (an OpenFOAM gui). I am modeling two incompressible fluids flowing in a relatively complex channel in order to see how they mix. I run a simulation using the mass-flow inlet boundary condition with a flow rate, let's say Q. Then I run a simulation using the velocity inlet boundary condition with a velocity v calculated as Q/A where A is the section of the channel. Then I should expect the same result. However the simulations give different results. Can anyone explain why? Which is the difference between the mass-flow inlet and velocity inlet boundary conditions? Thank you. |
|
June 13, 2016, 09:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Saideep
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: INDIA
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I mostly use a constant velocity inlet bc but when you say mass inlet, I am guessing that the density of fluid comes into play as well. That is, you need to think in terms of kg/s rather than in m3/s. I have no idea about the gui version of OF but if you have a check for your units that should say if what i told is true{kg/s} or not{m3/s}. Saideep |
|
June 13, 2016, 10:24 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
When I use the mass-flow inlet boundary condition, the unit for the inlet is [m3/s]. Maybe the gui version use the density for computing the mass flow rate.
I found out on the web that for Fluent the velocity inlet bc is recommended for incompressible flows while mass flow inlet bc is recommended for compressible flows. Do you think this is valid also in OpenFOAM? If so, can I say this is the reason why I have different simulation results? rekap |
|
June 13, 2016, 12:45 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Saideep
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: INDIA
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 12 |
For in-compressible flow density isn't varying. So, fixed flux/ fixed velocity is good enough. Even fixed mass should not be causing any sort of problem.
When you go for compressible flows, there are few parameters on which the density depends. One example of a general case, at the inlet you fix mass/ velocity and allow pressure to vary accordingly by a Neumann condition. When your pressure is fluctuating your density also varies. (ultimately your mass flow is varying over time). So, fixing the mass flow[kg/s] is a better condition than fixing velocity. I use in-compressible so if I am wrong any correction is welcome. Saideep |
|
June 14, 2016, 05:18 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Thank you for your answer, now it's clearer.
rekap |
|
October 17, 2016, 09:07 |
boundary problem
|
#6 |
New Member
rihen full
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14 |
I want to solve a ventilated wall problem. but ı cannot describe boundary condition esspecially for air. there is no velocity or mass for air. natural convection.
how can describe boundary inlet and outle |
|
Tags |
boundary conditions, inlet bc, massflow bc, simflow, velocity bc |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery | dowlee | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | August 6, 2021 07:40 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
What's the difference between velocity inlet and mass flow inlet? | soheil.e.nia | FLUENT | 5 | August 20, 2014 15:08 |
How to define a fixed velocity for a given mass flow rate on inlet | mqasimali | FLUENT | 2 | April 12, 2013 18:24 |
reversed flow at velocity inlet / mass flow inlet | ib | FLUENT | 1 | March 26, 2007 14:11 |