|
[Sponsors] |
May 21, 2016, 13:41 |
Reynolds-Stress Equation
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Hi all,
I have a problem deriving the Reynolds-Stress equation. I am trying to get the same results as Wilcox but - no chance. I always get one more term in the convective term and I don't know what they actually do to get rid of the term that I get. The derivation is in the attachment. The problem is the term: that is not included in the derivation of Wilcox. A few hints: All hints are appreciated. I think I make a simple mistake or do something wrong in a mathematic point of view. I also can achieve this equation: But in Wilcox only the underlines terms are mentioned.
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
|
May 22, 2016, 03:52 |
|
#2 |
New Member
VladJ
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
Tobias,
Have you possibly taken a look at the lecture notes of prof. Lars Davidson form Chalmers. He has done a section on transport equation for Reynolds stresses and it might be helpful. http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~lada/pos...ing.pdf#page76 Cheers and looking forward to see your derivation. |
|
May 22, 2016, 04:40 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Please click one of the Quick Reply icons in the posts above to activate Quick Reply.
Hi Vladimir, thanks for that hint. I will check it out. Yesterday I switched from Einsteins summation convention to the real derivatives. I think in this way it is clearer but for example, in the convective term for the first of 9 parts I get 20 terms Concentration is the thing you need. I will see if this will work but I will definitely check out your link. Maybe I am doing something wrong in mathematics or even its only due to the symmetry of the tensor.
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
|
May 22, 2016, 09:31 |
|
#4 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
Nice book, so why I am doing it ... no its good for my understanding. Unfortunately he only showed the Reynolds-Stress equation without the derivation.
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 22:43 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Error in Workbench "Unable to attach to geometry file" | Jeremie84 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 70 | October 25, 2017 17:03 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |
reynolds stress components in CEL | Roberto | CFX | 0 | December 3, 2008 04:29 |
reynolds stress | tufito | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 10, 2005 16:40 |