|
[Sponsors] |
October 11, 2013, 05:38 |
turbulence modelling near walls
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello Foamers,
I have a question using wall functions in OpenFOAM. In detail I am using the RAS turbulence model (k-epsilon) with wall functions. In case one uses wall functions for simulating turbulent quantities near walls, one usually has to ensure that y+ is greater than 30 there. Now I have the following question: How does OpenFOAM treat the wall functions in the case that y+ is around 1 at some walls? Does it just turn off the wall function (like some kind of all y+) there or nevertheless uses it (i.e. do I have to ensure y+ > 30 everywhere in advance when using wall functions)? Thanks in advance for your answers. Greets koimau |
|
October 12, 2013, 04:01 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 163
Rep Power: 15 |
if your y+~1 use kw-SST
|
|
October 12, 2013, 06:41 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Fumiya Nozaki
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 266
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi koimau,
I think that the answer for your questions change depending on the turbulence model and boundary condition you use. For the standard kEpsilon model, you might want to read the following document at page around 19: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get...FULLTEXT01.pdf Hi mechy, Is it appropriate to use kw-SST with so refined mesh? What is the suitable boundary condition? |
|
October 12, 2013, 06:49 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi koiamau,
I do not really know all the details of the OpenFOAM wall treatment. Considering that you are using the std wall treatment, it does not matter what is your y+, the log layer will be applied between your first node and the wall. If you have y+=1, your wall shear stresses will be highly inaccurate. If you try the kw (low Re turbulence model) you should try to have a y+ close to one ad lower than 3. Considering the sensitivity of this turbulence model to the BC's, the kw-SST blending model will be recomended. You can try to see the user guide if there is a kind o Automatic/Enhacment/Scalable wall treatment...If it does, is better to use them. Regards, |
|
October 12, 2013, 07:40 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 163
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
suitable Bc for what ? velocity========> fixed value pressure =======> zero gradient k=============> kqRwallFun... or lowReWall omega =========> omegaWallFun... |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
modelling zero gradient of turbulence | amirbahador | FLUENT | 0 | September 25, 2010 07:37 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |
Turbulence Modelling | Rick | FLUENT | 1 | February 17, 2007 19:02 |
modelling transition with v2f turbulence model | pablo | FLUENT | 0 | August 7, 2006 16:44 |
Turbulence Modelling | Himanshu Almadi | FLUENT | 1 | April 12, 2006 00:32 |