|
[Sponsors] |
July 25, 2013, 13:39 |
some error using rhoCentralFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
何刚
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello all,
I have used rhoCentralFoam to calculate a supersonic nozzle. When I use the upwind scheme, it's all right. But when I change the interpolation scheme to the second order scheme, such as quadraticUpwind, there is a zone next to the wall boundary in which the velocity is lager than the main steam.See the attachment, the two figures show the mach number distribute in the nozzle. Could someone tell me that why does this happen? The following is the fvSchem file: fluxScheme Kurganov; ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(tauMC) Gauss linear; div(phi,k) Gauss Minmod phi 1; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; interpolate(rho) quadraticUpwindFit phi 1; reconstruct(rho) quadraticUpwindFit 1; reconstruct(U) quadraticUpwindFit 1; reconstruct(T) quadraticUpwindFit 1; reconstruct(K) quadraticUpwindFit 1; /* reconstruct(rho) upwind; reconstruct(U) upwind; reconstruct(T) upwind; reconstruct(rho) Minmod; reconstruct(U) MinmodV; reconstruct(T) Minmod; reconstruct(Yi) Minmod; reconstruct(rho) linearUpwind phi; reconstruct(U) linearUpwindV phi; reconstruct(T) linearUpwind phi; reconstruct(K) linearUpwind phi; */ } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } Last edited by hg2lf; July 25, 2013 at 13:44. Reason: error |
|
July 26, 2013, 22:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
hi
Is you mesh fine enough near wall? Does it occur in linearUpwind too? Or Have you found out the reason?
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
July 27, 2013, 03:37 |
|
#3 |
New Member
何刚
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks,immortality,
The case file is too large to upload. I'm not sure whether the mesh is fine enough. It occur in any other scheme except upwind. But the un-physical solution is not in the boundary area, and it develops from the throat. I'll go on to find out the reason. Best regards. |
|
July 27, 2013, 11:55 |
|
#4 |
New Member
何刚
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 15 |
It seems as it linearUpwind scheme works well.
|
|
July 27, 2013, 14:56 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
how did you make the mesh?
then the problem is resolved?
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
July 30, 2013, 02:10 |
|
#6 |
New Member
何刚
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 15 |
Sorry, there comes the latest news, the problem haven't been solved. The finest mesh is the one associated with the characteristc line.
|
|
July 31, 2013, 13:58 |
|
#7 |
New Member
何刚
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 15 |
If I using an apreciate discrete schem to solve the subsonic part of the flow well, then it will be fine, Because the high value region develops from this part.
|
|
Tags |
compressible, nozzle, rhocentralfoam, supersonic |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rhoCentralFoam transport equation | JoaoDMiranda | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 29 | July 5, 2024 09:38 |
how to make rhoCentralFoam to write continuity residuals? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 18, 2018 04:56 |
dynamic mesh refinement and rhoCentralFoam | ChrisA | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | March 21, 2013 09:00 |
calculate a nozzle flow using rhoCentralFoam | hg2lf | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 25, 2012 22:26 |
rhoCentralFoam solver with Slip BCs fails in Parallel Only | JLight | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 11, 2012 22:08 |