CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

rho euation in rhoPisoFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree9Likes
  • 8 Post By alberto
  • 1 Post By alberto

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 2, 2010, 12:48
Default rho euation in rhoPisoFoam
  #1
Senior Member
 
Nilesh Rane
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 16
nileshjrane is on a distinguished road
Hi,

In rhoPisoFoam, the .c code includes rhoEqn.H file but the file is not in that folder. Is is getting included from some other common directory?? I am asking this because when i solve my simulation the rho equation is not getting solved, it seems.

Can anyone tell me, what is the problem here?? Why the rho equation is not being solved??

Quote:
Starting time loop

Courant Number mean: 0.00160209 max: 0.237358
Time = 1e-06

diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 2.11628e-11, No Iterations 3
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.98311e-11, No Iterations 3
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.87167e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 3.93336e-13, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.85699e-09, No Iterations 12
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 8.61972e-05, Final residual = 2.87593e-10, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 6.9308e-06, Final residual = 6.70903e-11, No Iterations 2
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.47432e-14, global = -1.96566e-15, cumulative = -1.96566e-15
DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 0.464004, Final residual = 4.19598e-09, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0986332, Final residual = 8.95905e-09, No Iterations 10
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.74445e-05, Final residual = 9.04744e-10, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 4.60957e-06, Final residual = 7.9637e-09, No Iterations 1
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.76913e-12, global = -3.46891e-13, cumulative = -3.48856e-13
DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 0.105746, Final residual = 5.79122e-10, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0235514, Final residual = 5.9246e-09, No Iterations 9
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.34825e-05, Final residual = 4.20418e-10, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 4.14208e-06, Final residual = 7.32319e-09, No Iterations 1
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.68586e-12, global = -2.74195e-13, cumulative = -6.23051e-13
DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 0.0263855, Final residual = 1.16006e-10, No Iterations 2
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00641807, Final residual = 4.27544e-09, No Iterations 8
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 5.14856e-06, Final residual = 6.37387e-09, No Iterations 1
DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 2.17279e-06, Final residual = 4.27578e-09, No Iterations 1
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.18805e-12, global = -1.21706e-13, cumulative = -7.44757e-13
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge..
nileshjrane is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 3, 2010, 22:06
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
Search your OpenFOAM-1.7.x/src directory for rhoEqn.H and you will find it. It is basically

solve(fvm::ddt(rho) + fvc::div(phi));

with explicit discretization of the divergence to avoid conservation errors.

The fact you see residuals equal to zero means that the solution is exact, not that the equation is not solved. You are using the diagonal solver, which is direct, and gives you the exact solution of the linear system.

Best,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 07:07
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Nilesh Rane
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 16
nileshjrane is on a distinguished road
But No of iterations is also 0.
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge..
nileshjrane is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2010, 13:02
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
This is really basic

How many iterations do you need to obtain the exact solution of a linear system with a direct solver? The answer is zero, because the method is not iterative

You basically can easily do that with the Thomas algorithm for whatever tri-diagonal system (or block tri-diagonal). Check a book on the topic to have the details.

Best,
ashish.vinayak likes this.
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2010, 08:44
Lightbulb
  #5
Senior Member
 
Nilesh Rane
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 16
nileshjrane is on a distinguished road
Ohh...OF takes it in that sense. I was thinking on different line. I thought if you solve an equation (or rather a system of equations in turn) 1 time then No of Iterations should be 1 and so on...

I do know about TDMA.. have used it in my UG assignments..

Thanks a lot..
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge..
nileshjrane is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to define and calculate LES variables rhoPisoFoam Jotazeld OpenFOAM 1 April 3, 2020 05:12
Low Mach number Compressible jet flow using LES ankgupta8um OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 January 15, 2011 14:38
rhoPisoFoam stability problems at low Mach ivan_cozza OpenFOAM 1 October 1, 2010 12:03
help: rhoPisoFoam to compressibleInterFoam jason.ryon OpenFOAM 0 March 8, 2010 13:45
Error log vw.cfd OpenFOAM 6 August 7, 2009 06:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:48.