|
[Sponsors] |
June 22, 2006, 10:27 |
I want to do RANS with variabl
|
#1 |
Member
chris book
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 17 |
I want to do RANS with variable density. The governing equations for my problem known but I was wondering how to treat the favre averaged values!
- Are the variables automatically favre averaged when using a compressible RANS-model? - When the solver computes i.e. k,epsilon ... are these the Favre averged values which I get back? As you can see I am a little bit confused with these averaging things. |
|
June 22, 2006, 11:13 |
Yes, and yes.
The point of
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Gavin Tabor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes, and yes.
The point of Favre averaging is that it is a mathematical trick designed to get us back to the same form of the equations. We _know_ how to solve the NSE in the form ddt(rho u) + div(rho u u) = ... When we average this equation /\ we get ddt(/rho u \) + .... Favre averaging allows us to split /rho u\ into separate variables, getting back to where we started again. So, yes; when using a compressible RANS model, the variables will be by definition assumed to be Favre averaged. Gavin |
|
July 14, 2012, 22:29 |
Favre or RANS averaged equations are used in incompresible reacting flow ?
|
#3 |
New Member
Ayan
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
I'm simulating incompresible reacting flow case where RSM is used as turbulence model. I have doubt about what fluent is actually solving for my case. Whether Favre-averaged NSE or RANS averaged NSE.
Can anybody help ? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Averaged values of a surface??? | pah | FLUENT | 0 | December 2, 2005 07:56 |
Mass averaged output values | Cb | Siemens | 0 | January 18, 2005 05:59 |
Favre average | Ale | FLUENT | 2 | April 7, 2004 05:09 |
LES and Favre averaged and Filtered. | Jo Blake | Main CFD Forum | 5 | July 2, 2003 08:37 |
Favre Filter | Manosh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 15, 2002 13:25 |