|
[Sponsors] |
April 26, 2007, 14:39 |
Can someone explain briefly wh
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Srinath Madhavan (a.k.a pUl|)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 703
Rep Power: 21 |
Can someone explain briefly what this entry is used for?
|
|
April 26, 2007, 14:48 |
Yup, easy. Thin of the calcul
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Yup, easy. Thin of the calculation of the fluxes in the pressure equation. Once everything is done properly, the pressure part of the flux is equal to the off-diagonal matrix coefficient related to the face, multiplied by the pressure field (difference, or for compressible flow, a slightly more complex).
Now, think of discretisation of a Laplacian: this one also got the non-orthogonal correction, which is explicit. The correction therefore also appears in the flux and must be fully consistent: if not, you get a mass continuity error. The best way to accumulate all corrections of this kind is to simply collect the stuff during matrix assembly. Because this costs money (storage and operations), you don't want to do this for every matrix assembly. Thus, a fluxRequired flag means "collect the explicit contributions", after which you can ask the matrix for the flux (or flux correction). If you don't need the flux, you don't do fluxRequired and all is well! Clear? Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
May 5, 2009, 08:27 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17 |
Currently I am trying to use turbDyMFoam, but I get the following error:
Code:
BiCGStab: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.72088e-14, No Iterations 1 BiCGStab: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.22064e-13, No Iterations 1 BiCGStab: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 2.69711e-12, No Iterations 1 BiCGStab: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.52076e-08, No Iterations 404 BiCGStab: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0442768, Final residual = 6.64096e-08, No Iterations 302 flux requested but p not specified in the fluxRequired sub-dictionary of fvSchemes. From function fvMatrix<Type>::flux() in file /home/chapman/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.5-dev/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude/fvMatrix.C at line 777. Code:
fluxRequired { default no; pcorr; p; } Regards, Andy Edit: I found this thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...ictionary.html and checked my fvSchemes. However, the problem was not fixed for me. Last edited by chapman; May 5, 2009 at 09:48. Reason: Added link to another thread. |
|
January 23, 2015, 06:57 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Dongyue Li
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 848
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
|
||
May 1, 2015, 12:30 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Diego
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Turin,Italy
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Yes, if I'm not wrong:
1) go to Santiago Marquez PhD Thesis here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2lp...VLb3lGekk/edit 2) go to page 95 (MULES + PISO Algorithm explanation) You will see that in order to solve the flux at point 1.C, you need the to create a flux from 1.B. (fluxRequired: alpha.water). In the same manner, in order to solve the flux at point 3.D, you need first the flux of the gradient of the pressure calculated from 3.C (fluxRequired: p_rgh). So in this case we have to set: fluxRequired { default no; p_rgh; alpha.water; } in order to storage the flux created from the discretization of alpha equation in the MULES algorithm and the flux created from the pressure equation in PISO loop. This is what I understood from openFoam user guide |
|
Tags |
fluxrequired |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
space shuttle re-entry CFD | Nimesh Meghpara | FLUENT | 0 | July 5, 2008 19:34 |
Entry point | lucian | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 1 | March 13, 2007 05:04 |
Tangential Entry in 2D probelms | Kirru | FLUENT | 1 | October 16, 2006 09:26 |
Tangential Entry in 2D structure? | Kiran | FLUENT | 0 | December 6, 2005 05:42 |
table entry | carno | Siemens | 1 | May 28, 2005 12:29 |