|
[Sponsors] |
August 28, 2007, 20:15 |
During a discussion on IRC. a
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36 |
During a discussion on IRC. a doubt about reactingFoam implementation came out.
In reactingFoam, the transport equation for the specie mass fration contains the diffusional term in the form: fvm::laplacian(turbulence->muEff(), Yi) which means that the effective specie diffusivity is assumed to be equal to the effective viscosity: Deff = D_lam + D_turb = nu_lam/Sc_lam + nu_turb/Sc_turb = nu_lam + nu_turb which means that Sc_lam = Sc_turb = 1 Why this assumption is done? For example, in a laminar calculation, if we consider water, the viscosity of the fluid and the diffusivity of a specie, for example the oxygen, can be very different. At 25°C we have: D_02 ~ 2.0 * 10^-10 m^2/s nu_H20 ~ 1.0 * 10^-4 m^2/s In turbulent flows, the turbulent Schmidt number is set to 0.7 in other codes, but however it can change too. For example, in a pipe with passive transport it's between 0.6 and 0.9. Thanks in advance for any clarification. With kind regards, Alberto
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541) OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods. To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using. |
|
March 27, 2009, 08:44 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Lu,Y.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I guess the reason is that when dealing with turbulent combustion, the molecular transport are often small compared to their tubulent counterparts and so are neglected.
But I think it is very important of you to have pointed it out that when dealing with laminar combustion with OpenFoam, special attention may have to be paid to the issue. But I am not very sure about this. |
|
March 27, 2009, 13:22 |
|
#3 |
Member
M. Mahdi Salehi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
You are right alberto, I usually use fvm::laplacian(turbulence->muEff()/Sc, Yi) and set Sc=0.7.
|
|
December 4, 2010, 13:03 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
i have a problem and i think you can help me. my problem is mass transfer from solid to liquid with electrochemical method and i want simulate this problem with openfoam and i cant find solver for it. how resolvent your problem? use a solver or write a code for it. if you write a code : can i have your code? very very thank in advance |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ReactingFoam Laminar flame simulation transport properties | gbansal | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | November 23, 2012 17:03 |
Please explain the implementation of species transport Eqn in reactingFoam | kallipygian | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 13, 2008 08:29 |
Laminar diffusion flames and reactingFoam Transport properties | jgaricano | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 4, 2008 17:58 |
Poisson equation combined with transport equation | Se-Hee | CFX | 0 | December 27, 2007 02:00 |
transport equation | CMB | Siemens | 2 | July 9, 2004 06:19 |