|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2009, 20:28 |
Hi everyone,
What's the point
|
#1 |
Member
M. Mahdi Salehi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everyone,
What's the point of defining mvConvection object? why not simply using fvm:div(phi, Yi) and fvm:div(phi, h)? Thanks, Mahdi |
|
September 15, 2010, 15:28 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Seyyed Ali H.M.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello mehdi
Did you get any response to this question?
__________________
SAHM |
|
December 1, 2010, 11:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Björn
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 16 |
ohje......
Nobody has an answer....... ?? |
|
February 11, 2011, 10:59 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Illya Shevchuk
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm also interested at...
|
|
August 26, 2011, 19:39 |
mvconvection
|
#5 |
Member
Farshad
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I am still waiting to see the answer. Thanks, Farshad |
|
August 27, 2011, 06:00 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
All the div(phi, Yi) and div(phi, h) have a similar discretization form, except for the tracked variable. With mvConvection object, you can use a single surface interpolator (multivariateSurfaceInterpolationScheme) for all the div(phi, Yi) which will save a lot of efforts for setting the discretization scheme. Such a treatment can also speed up calculation relative to the form of fvm:div(phi, Yi). Hope this helps. Regards, Junwei |
||
April 11, 2017, 13:38 |
|
#7 |
Member
Mehdi Aminyavari
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Milan
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 10 |
||
April 16, 2019, 11:22 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Yan Zhang
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 12 |
I know it is 2019 now!
But I got different results with this mvConvection. In my solver, two additional variable is transported. When I use separate scheme for these two variable ( fvm::div(phi, field) ), I found that the results is different with mvConvection ( mvConvection->fvmDiv(phi, field) ). So, is there any other difference between mvConvection->fvmDiv and fvm::div?
__________________
https://openfoam.top |
|
Tags |
mvconvection, reactingfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ReactingFoam | vassilis | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 75 | September 11, 2013 16:22 |
DieselFoam and ReactingFoam | matteo_rosa_sentinella | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 4 | September 28, 2009 11:35 |
ReactingFoam solver | muthukaalai | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 16, 2008 14:36 |
ReactingFoam without reactions | lasb | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | June 10, 2008 09:50 |
ReactingFoam error | prashant24983 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 4, 2007 05:54 |