|
[Sponsors] |
VoF comparison for different openFoam Versions |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 5, 2023, 08:20 |
VoF comparison for different openFoam Versions
|
#1 |
New Member
Alexander Meier
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9 |
Howdy interFoamers,
Over the last few days I was trying to get a VoF case properly running with openfoam v9 - interFoam with/without MPLIC interface treatment. I did get random crashes - so i dug into that rabbit hole to understand where i'm doing something wrong. I ended up running the "damBreakWithObstacle" tutorial cases for different openfoam versions and got various results (visualization in the attached image):
I did not expect to get such varying results even on the tutorial cases - maybe that helps others as well. (and yes i'm aware i'm using old versions of OF - but that's what i have installed on the compute cluster at the moment...) cheers flowgeek |
|
December 19, 2023, 18:37 |
|
#2 |
Member
Rishikesh
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 10 |
I have noticed weird unstable behaviour in OF9 multiphase as well. The solver behaved far more poorly in controlling numerical perturbations etc, to the point that an initially stagnant laminar cylindrical bath with circular surface started to move around like a spinning coin on a table.
|
|
January 8, 2024, 08:24 |
|
#3 |
Member
Lourenço SM
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 12 |
Nice post!
What about the calculation time of v2012 and v11? The v11 is with MPLIC? Cheers, Lourenço |
|
January 8, 2024, 10:42 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Alexander Meier
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9 |
hi Lourenço
v11 was also with MPLIC. On the simulation times --> can't check it anymore... deleted the files last week cheers |
|
January 8, 2024, 11:15 |
|
#5 |
Member
Lourenço SM
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 12 |
Regarding the time, do you have any approximate estimation?
Last edited by lourencosm; January 8, 2024 at 11:16. Reason: language correction, better undersanding |
|
January 11, 2024, 03:24 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I can just confirm that I get the same behavior when comparing v10 and v11. v10 crashes without warning, i.e., residuals, time-step and Courant number looks fine before the crash. On different machines it can reach different simulation times before the crash. I just copied the cases from the tutorial folders so I have not explicitly checked if they are identical in setup, other than controlDict and decomposePar. |
|
January 11, 2024, 09:10 |
|
#7 |
Member
Lourenço SM
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 12 |
||
Tags |
interfoam, interisofoam, openfoam 10, openfoam 11, openfoam 2012 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Using different MPI types and versions with OpenFOAM | spaceprop | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | May 28, 2018 04:31 |
OpenFOAM 4.0 Released | CFDFoundation | OpenFOAM Announcements from OpenFOAM Foundation | 2 | October 6, 2017 06:40 |
OpenFOAM v3.0.1 Training, London, Houston, Berlin, Jan-Mar 2016 | cfd.direct | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | January 5, 2016 04:18 |
OpenFOAM Training, London, Chicago, Munich, Sep-Oct 2015 | cfd.direct | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 2 | August 31, 2015 14:36 |
Comparison of axisymmetric case, Starccm+ and OpenFOAM | linnemann | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | June 16, 2011 06:43 |