|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2023, 10:12 |
BuoyantSimpleFoam blows up
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Nico
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 6 |
Hey, recently i started using BuoyantSimpleFoam i did a small analysis for a pipe that worked exceptionally well, now i want to use another geometry. However if i run the case just with a different geometry (a corrugated channel instead of a pipe) the case is very instable and functionbojects as well as residuals are all over the place.
My boundary conditions are the following: U Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform (0.397441359254415 0 0); } outlet { type zeroGradient; } wallHeatedTop { type noSlip; } wallHeatedBottom { type noSlip; } wallAdiabatic { type noSlip; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } wallHeatedTop { type fixedGradient; gradient uniform 823.723229; } wallHeatedBottom { type fixedGradient; gradient uniform 823.723229; } wallAdiabatic { type zeroGradient; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" ".*" { type calculated; value $internalField; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" ".*" { type fixedFluxPressure; value $internalField; } outlet { type fixedValue; value $internalField; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type turbulentMixingLengthFrequencyInlet; mixingLength 0.000314802028337; value $internalField; } outlet { type inletOutlet; value $internalField; inletValue $internalField; } wallHeatedTop { type omegaWallFunction; value $internalField; } wallHeatedBottom { type omegaWallFunction; value $internalField; } wallAdiabatic { type omegaWallFunction; value $internalField; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.061871583783885; value $internalField; } outlet { type inletOutlet; value $internalField; inletValue $internalField; } wallHeatedTop { type kqRWallFunction; value $internalField; } wallHeatedBottom { type kqRWallFunction; value $internalField; } wallAdiabatic { type kqRWallFunction; value $internalField; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type calculated; value $internalField; } outlet { type calculated; value $internalField; } wallHeatedTop { type compressible::alphatJayatillekeWallFunction; Prt 0.85; value $internalField; } wallHeatedBottom { type compressible::alphatJayatillekeWallFunction; Prt 0.85; value $internalField; } wallAdiabatic { type compressible::alphatJayatillekeWallFunction; Prt 0.85; value $internalField; } } Code:
boundaryField { #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" inlet { type calculated; value $internalField; } outlet { type calculated; value $internalField; } wallHeatedTop { type nutUSpaldingWallFunction; value uniform 0; } wallHeatedBottom { type nutUSpaldingWallFunction; value uniform 0; } wallAdiabatic { type nutUSpaldingWallFunction; value uniform 0; } } fvSchemes Code:
ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(phi,h) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(phi,epsilon) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(phi,omega) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(phi,k) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(phi,K) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1.0; div(((rho*nuEff)*dev2(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected 0.5; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected 0.5; } wallDist { method meshWave; } Code:
solvers { p_rgh { solver GAMG; smoother symGaussSeidel; tolerance 1e-7; relTol 0.01; } "(U|h|k|omega).*" { solver PBiCGStab; preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e-7; relTol 0.1; } } SIMPLE { momentumPredictor yes; nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 6; pRefCell 0; pRefValue 0; residualControl { U 1e-5; p 1e-4; } convergenceCriterion 1e-5; nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0; } relaxationFactors { fields { rho 1.0; p_rgh 0.7; } equations { U 0.6; h 0.6; k 0.7; omega 0.7; } } Code:
DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.664815, Final residual = 0.0279068, No Iterations 1 DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.609525, Final residual = 0.0235257, No Iterations 1 DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.576135, Final residual = 0.0201185, No Iterations 1 DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for h, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 0.0342401, No Iterations 1 GAMG: Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 0.980315, Final residual = 2.79509e+45, No Iterations 1000 time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.61911e+76, global = 1.10847e+75, cumulative = 1.10847e+75 DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for omega, Initial residual = 0.0335261, Final residual = 0.00216062, No Iterations 1 bounding omega, min: -8.37521e+26 max: 2.35929e+28 average: 1.8426e+23 DILUPBiCGStab: Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.0322659, Final residual = 0.00302361, No Iterations 1 bounding k, min: -4.26595e+07 max: 5.82216e+08 average: 14976.7 ExecutionTime = 387.68 s ClockTime = 388 s wallHeatFlux wallHeatFlux1 write: writing object wallHeatFlux min, max, Q [W], q [W/m^2] for patch wallHeatedTop = 503.753, 503.753, 9.18111, 503.753 min, max, Q [W], q [W/m^2] for patch wallHeatedBottom = 503.753, 503.753, 9.1811, 503.753 surfaceFieldValue t_fluid write: areaAverage(outlet) of T = 300.039 surfaceFieldValue outletTemperature write: areaAverage(outlet) of T = 299.953 surfaceFieldValue wallHeatedTopTemperature write: areaAverage(wallHeatedTop) of T = 297.311 surfaceFieldValue wallHeatedBottomTemperature write: areaAverage(wallHeatedBottom) of T = 297.341 surfaceFieldValue wallAdiabaticTemperature write: areaAverage(wallAdiabatic) of T = 297.232 yPlus yPlus1 write: writing object yPlus patch wallHeatedTop y+ : min = 2.85538e+35, max = 1.13867e+38, average = 3.53941e+36 patch wallHeatedBottom y+ : min = 1.75043e+35, max = 1.46169e+38, average = 4.03137e+36 patch wallAdiabatic y+ : min = 2.2173e+35, max = 8.39086e+37, average = 3.46597e+36 volFieldValue averageTemperatureFluid write: volAverage(channel) of T = 297.577 surfaceFieldValue deltaP.region1 write: areaAverage(inlet) of p = -1.64028e+93 surfaceFieldValue deltaP.region2 write: areaAverage(outlet) of p = 0 I appreciate any hint or feedback! |
|
March 22, 2023, 16:12 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4 |
Hi,
did you try to run in laminar and see if the calculation runs smoothly? |
|
June 16, 2023, 11:58 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello Hr_kules,
I'm facing a similar issue, did you find any solution ? Thanks |
|
June 19, 2023, 05:29 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
BuoyantSimpleFoam and its siblings are thought / tested for free convection. They accept addition external velocity, but have numerical problems with it. Normally, there is a small area which runs out of physics, and this spreads to the whole simulation.
I did not find any cure about this but another physical formulation.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
June 20, 2023, 09:03 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Nico
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 6 |
||
June 20, 2023, 09:05 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Nico
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
June 20, 2023, 13:11 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Already tried, it didn't worked for me, but thanks for the reply !
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instability in buoyantSimpleFoam | Avandri | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 7, 2020 17:13 |
cfmesh and buoyantSimpleFoam questions | Rotidpor | OpenFOAM | 1 | April 26, 2019 04:03 |
Simulation of Water with buoyantSimpleFoam possible? | BenFranklinIII | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 24, 2015 06:57 |
buoyantSimpleFoam | samiam1000 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 22, 2012 09:20 |
Running buoyantSimpleFoam with oodles data as initialisation | samulu | OpenFOAM | 5 | November 19, 2009 12:49 |