|
[Sponsors] |
Parcels minimum temperature in reactingParcelFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 22, 2022, 12:55 |
Parcels minimum temperature in reactingParcelFoam
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello everybody !
I am currently working on a simulation involving liquid nitrogen being sprayed around in a methane (gaseous) pipe for cooling purposes. reactingParcelFoam seems to be a good choice, and initial tests with modified tutorials work really well. But once I introduce liquid N2 and methane at low temperatures (around 90K), the solver can't run and tells me: Pressure below triple point pressure: p = 9912.195865 < Pt = 12517.39172 I also noticed that my nitrogen particles were stuck at 200K although they are supposed to be at 81K. So I suspect that OpenFoam won't work at temperatures lower than 200K for stability reasons? The solver runs ok when I disable the parcels injection. Here are some files : Cloud properties Code:
solution { active yes; coupled true; transient yes; cellValueSourceCorrection on; maxCo 0.05; sourceTerms { schemes { rho explicit 1; U explicit 1; Yi explicit 1; h explicit 1; radiation explicit 1; } } interpolationSchemes { rho cell; U cellPoint; thermo:mu cell; T cell; Cp cell; kappa cell; p cell; } integrationSchemes { U Euler; T analytical; } } constantProperties { //rho0 1000; rhoMin 10; rhoMax 2000; T0 81; Cp0 2055; Tmin 50; //Tmax 150; constantVolume false; minParticleMass 1e-20; //volumeUpdateMethod updateRhoAndVol; } subModels { particleForces { sphereDrag; gravity; } injectionModels { model1 { type coneInjection; //patch inlet_liquide; SOI 0.001; massTotal 0.0036; //was 6.0e-6 parcelBasisType mass; injectionMethod disc; flowType flowRateAndDischarge; //utile? //outerDiameter 1e-3; //was 1.9e-4; //innerDiameter 0; duration 1; //was 1.25e-3; //position ( 0 0.4995 0 ); //direction ( 0 -1 0 ); positionAxis //added ( //added (( -0.029 0 0 ) ( -1 0 0 )) //added ); //added parcelsPerInjector 10000; //added //parcelsPerSecond 10000; //modified was 10000000 flowRateProfile constant 1; Cd constant 0.8; //was 0.9 Umag constant 3; //added thetaInner constant 0.0; thetaOuter constant 20.0; sizeDistribution { type fixedValue; fixedValueDistribution { value 0.00002; } } } } dispersionModel none; patchInteractionModel localInteraction; heatTransferModel RanzMarshall; compositionModel singleMixtureFraction; phaseChangeModel liquidEvaporation; devolatilisationModel none; surfaceReactionModel none; stochasticCollisionModel none; surfaceFilmModel none; radiation off; localInteractionCoeffs { patches ( "(walls|cyc.*)" { type rebound; } "(inlet_liquide|inlet_gaz|outlet)" { type escape; } ); writeToFile yes; } RanzMarshallCoeffs { BirdCorrection true; } singleMixtureFractionCoeffs { phases ( gas { //O2 0.21; //N2 0.79; } liquid { N2 1; } solid { } ); YGasTot0 0; YLiquidTot0 1; YSolidTot0 0; } liquidEvaporationCoeffs { enthalpyTransfer enthalpyDifference; activeLiquids ( N2 ); } } cloudFunctions { } Code:
thermoType { type heRhoThermo; mixture reactingMixture; transport polynomial; thermo hPolynomial; energy sensibleEnthalpy; equationOfState icoPolynomial; specie specie; } chemistryReader foamChemistryReader; foamChemistryFile "<constant>/foam.inp"; foamChemistryThermoFile "<constant>/thermo.incompressiblePoly"; liquids { N2; } //dpdt off; //pRef 101325; solids {} inertSpecie CH4; Thanks for any help you might provide |
|
July 25, 2022, 11:20 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 5 |
Hey again,
I figured out my mistake. In the constantProperties of the reactingCloudProperties file, we can add the field TMin (I had tried several variants such as tMin, TLow, Tlow etc but with no avail ). So the subdictionary looks like this: Code:
constantProperties { //rho0 790; //rhoMin 10; //rhoMax 2000; T0 81; Cp0 2600; TMin 50; TMax 150; constantVolume false; //minParticleMass 1e-20; volumeUpdateMethod constantRho; } Since I enabled the liquidEvaporation model, I think it has to do with the phase change, but it still seems suspicious to me that cold particles in a hotter gas get colder just due to the phase change. Maybe someone more qualified in thermodynamics can point me in the right direction? Thanks! |
|
August 2, 2022, 06:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 5 |
I would like to bump this thread as I have not solved all my issues
To sum up, I am spraying liquid nitrogen droplets (at around 81 kelvins) in a pipe full of gaseous methane (at 95 kelvins). I would expect the droplets to heat up and evaporate while the methane cools down. But although the methane cools down, the droplets drop in temperature around 62-64K (remember, I override the TMin limit). My thermophysicalProperties look like this : Code:
thermoType { type heRhoThermo; mixture multiComponentMixture; transport const; thermo hConst; equationOfState rhoConst; specie specie; energy sensibleEnthalpy; } N2 { specie { molWeight 28; } equationOfState { rho 800; } thermodynamics { Cp 2000; Hf 0; } transport { mu 1.5e-4; Pr 3.5; } } CH4 { specie { molWeight 16; } equationOfState { rho 2.6; } thermodynamics { Cp 2260; Hf 0; } transport { mu 4.5e-6; Pr 0.75; } } inertSpecie CH4; liquids { N2; } solids { } What am I missing here? Thanks for any help you might provide |
|
August 3, 2022, 12:37 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 5 |
Hi again! Last post since I think I figured out why my particles act this way, I will stop spamming
So I conducted more tests with different concentrations of gaseous methane + gaseous nitrogen at the inlet, in addition to the liquid nitrogen being sprayed inside the pipe.
Considering these two cases, I think I missed the fact that the droplets temperature change also depends on the relative concentration of the gaseous N2 already present. The two mechanisms involved in the heat transfer are evaporation and convection. When the "relative humidity" in N2 is low, the heat loss by evaporation overtakes the heat gain happening through convection and the droplet temperature falls. In my case, the droplet temperature falls to 63.15K which is the triple point for N2, so my droplets go through sublimation basically. But when there is already a significant concentration of N2 in the gaseous phase, the evaporation is less prevalent, and the heat balance becomes positive thanks to convection, thus the temperature rises. Anyways, it seems like basic thermodynamics but it got me really confused I am not certain about this, so if anyone can confirm or correct me, that would be great, cheers! |
|
Tags |
methane, nitrogen, parcels, reactingparcelfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
whats the cause of error? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 24, 2021 08:15 |
outlet temperature | jigneshrohit99 | FLUENT | 1 | March 25, 2016 14:26 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
Is wall ajacent temperature equal to conservative temperature of the wall? | shenying0710 | CFX | 8 | January 4, 2013 05:03 |