|
[Sponsors] |
August 4, 2020, 12:16 |
Odd results with solar load
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
Hello all,
I'm trying to make a case with solar loading. Only some of my surfaces are attached to solids, the rest are adiabatic. All surfaces (except for the outer domain walls) are opaqueDiffusive. This setup is very similar to the simpleCarSolarPanel tutorial. That tutorial looks to have reasonable interactions with the surfaces; the opaque surfaces, even though they're adiabatic, provide shade for other surfaces behind them. This can be seen by looking at the qr field. However my case (with a similar setup) has very strange shading interactions. Sometimes opaque surfaces provide shade, sometimes they don't, and qr is only nonzero on the surfaces which attach to solids; the other adiabatic surfaces always show qr=0, which doesn't make sense. Can anyone see errors in my setup here? Attached is an image from a test case with the sun pointing straight down (-z). From this perspective, only the cap and the top vane should see any direct sun at all, and the others should be almost completely shaded, but clearly that's not the case. Images here: https://imgur.com/a/Q3DbIYG boundaryRadiationProperties: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v1912 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "constant"; object boundaryRadiationProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // "domain_inlet" { type transparent; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; emissivity (1 1); absorptivity (0 0); } } "domain_outlet" { type transparent; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; emissivity (1 1); absorptivity (0 0); } } "domain_left" { type transparent; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; emissivity (1 1); absorptivity (0 0); } } "domain_right" { type transparent; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; emissivity (1 1); absorptivity (0 0); } } "domain_top" { type transparent; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; emissivity (1 1); absorptivity (0 0); } } "domain_ground" { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.6 0.6); emissivity (0.98 0.98); }; } bottom_plate { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } chassis_poles { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } raspi_zero_w { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.7 0.7); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } sensor_mount { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } sensor_support { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } vanes { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } cap { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } hardware_plate { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } sensor { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.7 0.7); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } top_plate { type opaqueDiffusive; wallAbsorptionEmissionModel { type multiBandAbsorption; absorptivity (0.3 0.3); emissivity (0.8 0.8); }; } // ************************************************************************* // radiationProperties: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v1912 | | \\ / A nd | Website: www.openfoam.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "constant"; object radiationProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // radiation on; radiationModel solarLoad; solarLoadCoeffs { // Sun direction ray model. Give the sunDirection or calculated using the // (solar calculator) sunDirectionModel sunDirConstant; //sunDirTracking // Time interval to update Sun position (sec) sunTrackingUpdateInterval 800; sunDirection (0 0 -1); localStandardMeridian -5; // GMT offset (hours) startDay 204; // day of the year startTime 15.0; // time of the day (hours decimal) longitude -80.917; // longitude (degrees) latitude 28.453; // latitude (degrees) // Grid orientation gridUp (0 0 1); gridEast (1 0 0); // Energy spectrum spectralDistribution (2 1); // Solar model: // sunLoadConstant-sunLoadFairWeatherConditions-SunLoadTheoreticalMaximum; sunLoadModel sunLoadConstant; // Sun load constant model directSolarRad 500; // [w/m2] diffuseSolarRad 0; // [w/m2] // Fair Weather Conditions Model Constants. // Calculate beta from the Solar calculator or input A 500; // Apparent solar irradiation at air mass m = 0 B 0.142; // Atmospheric extinction coefficient //beta 45; // Solar altitude (in degrees) above the horizontal // Theoretical maximum model constants Setrn 10; SunPrime 1; // Ground reflectivity groundReflectivity 0.2; // Solar diffusivity constants C 0.058; // Model constant // Radiative flux coupling flags solidCoupled true; //Couple through qr the solid regions (default true) wallCoupled false; //Couple through qr wall patches (default false) // Reflecting rays useReflectedRays true; reflecting { nPhi 10; nTheta 10; } absorptionEmissionModel none; scatterModel none; sootModel none; } viewFactorCoeffs { smoothing true; //Smooth view factor matrix (use when in a close surface //to force Sum(Fij = 1) constantEmissivity true; //constant emissivity on surfaces. nBands 2; useSolarLoad true; } // Number of flow iterations per radiation iteration solverFreq 1; absorptionEmissionModel none; scatterModel none; sootModel none; // ************************************************************************* // |
|
October 12, 2020, 23:25 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 25 |
I may have found the solution to this.
In faceShading.C, the start and end points of the rays used to calculate face intersections are computed using the face center of a given face and a vector d. Vector d is calculated as: Code:
scalar maxBounding = 5.0*mag(mesh_.bounds().max() - mesh_.bounds().min()); const vector d(direction_*maxBounding); where direction_ is the direction specified in the solar load. So essentially we scale the direction_ by a geometric size which is proportional to the length of the diagonal of the bounding box of the mesh. The start and end points used for mesh intersection are calculated: Code:
start.append(fc - 0.001*d); end.append(fc - d); This means that the start point, depending on a given face having proximity to a different face, may not be very close to the (original) face that the line intersection is being calculated on. In my case, since I have a lot of fins close together, this occurred. One can sidestep this problem by just making the direction multiplication very small, i.e. Code:
start.append(fc - 0.00001*d); end.append(fc - d); |
|
January 11, 2022, 06:07 |
|
#3 |
Member
Bushra Rasheed
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi!
I'm not getting non zero qr on any surface when I trun on view factor with solar load. I do not have multiple regions, just a domain with a wall inside. I'm going to try the solution you mentioned but have one confusion: Is it necessary to have multiple regions for view factor ? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solar Load and fvDOM Radiation Modeling | Shadab_Ilahi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 28, 2024 08:11 |
ray-tracing solar load vs DO radiation model | nima_nz | FLUENT | 5 | June 26, 2024 01:32 |
Turned on solar load model, but solar heat flux in the counter plot still remain 0? | szhang | FLUENT | 0 | December 1, 2018 12:43 |
Problem with Solar Ray Tracing apply - please help | anna9 | FLUENT | 1 | January 22, 2017 07:01 |
Impact of Solar Load model on wall temperature | vadvadim | FLUENT | 1 | July 14, 2016 18:03 |