|
[Sponsors] |
June 24, 2020, 12:41 |
Flow past circular cylinder - turbulent case
|
#1 |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Hii,
I am still stuck on this problem. Please help! I am new to OpenFoam and trying to simulate flow past a circular cylinder at Re = 3900. But my drag coefficient is coming out to be very low. I have attached the required file. Please help where i am getting wrong? I am using rhoPimpleFoam solver. Please ask if you need to know any more data but please help. Thanks in advance. https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...Vh?usp=sharing Last edited by tony256; June 25, 2020 at 08:42. |
|
June 24, 2020, 15:30 |
|
#2 |
Member
Ardalan
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta, USA
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 14 |
Are you using any turbulence model? If no, you are right stay with laminar.
Is it 2D case with empty boundaries in sides? If yes, that is a problem in underestimating the drag. The only reason with low drag is coarse mesh. Meh the resolution finer in azimuthal and wall normal directions. |
|
June 25, 2020, 02:37 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
yes i amusing kEqn turbulent model. Ok, then can you suggest what BC can be used at front and back? Thank you so much the reply. |
||
June 25, 2020, 09:47 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi and welcome to OpenFOAM!
How do you calculate the drag? I suggest you to use functions (forceCoeff) in your controlDict, if you did not already do that. Are you sure, that Aref and lref are correct? If your case is 2D, front and back are supposed to be empty. Kind regards |
|
June 25, 2020, 11:19 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
The diameter of cylinder in my case is 1. Hence, i have set the value lref = 1 and Aref = 0.041315 (lref*pi*D/76). This is a 3D case, still i am not getting correct results. Please see the drive link i have attached and help!. |
||
June 25, 2020, 12:56 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
I did a lot of airfoil simulation in the past few months to calculate lift and drag and your case is quite similar to an airfoil calculation. On the first glance it seems that you have calculated Aref wrong. In an airfoil case, lref = chord length, while Aref = lref*thickness perpendicular to lref. This means in your case Aref = 1*thickness (thickness is here the length of the cylinder). This might solve your problem.
|
|
June 25, 2020, 14:34 |
|
#7 | |
Member
Ardalan
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta, USA
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
If you are using 3D case with spanwise extension, that should be fine enough. You can find reasonable resolution in the literature. You should know that your viscous sublayer in fully laminar. It makes you simulation tricky. conventional URANS models do not work for your case. Keep your domain large enough and resolution fine enough. It will work. Good luck Ardalan |
||
June 25, 2020, 16:13 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
I am still not getting correct results. Can you send me your email ID so that i can send you my case file? I am really stuck on this problem.
|
|
June 25, 2020, 16:15 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
June 25, 2020, 17:30 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
I advise you to watch this tutorial. This should describe your case very well. So the learning effect is definitely higher:
https://youtu.be/YOT62t2IiDE |
|
June 26, 2020, 06:55 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
June 26, 2020, 07:35 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 |
Have a look on the OpenFoam solver list:
https://www.openfoam.com/documentati...rd-solvers.php pimpleFoam solves transient simulations and stands for the property of a parameter to follow a constant value over time. rhoPimpleFoam takes compressible and heat transfer effects into account. simpleFoam solves steady-state simulations. I would recommend you to start easy and to use simpleFoam. If that works and you want to simulate something similar like the Karman Vortex Street, switch over to pimpleFoam. But I don't think that you should take compressibility (rhoPimpleFoam) into account at these low velocities. |
|
June 26, 2020, 12:44 |
|
#13 | |
New Member
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DesignModeler] DesignModeler Scripting: How to get Full Command Access | ANT | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 53 | February 16, 2020 16:13 |
Turbulent flow over a circular cylinder? | ck3 | FLUENT | 6 | May 4, 2018 13:20 |
Turbulent flow over a circular cylinder | ck3 | FLUENT | 3 | March 3, 2015 03:44 |
2D flow around a circular cylinder case with interFoam solver | shuoxue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 31, 2013 06:04 |
Tubulent flow past circular cylinder at Re=3900 | Jinglei | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 11, 2007 07:05 |