CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Flow past circular cylinder - turbulent case

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Ardali
  • 1 Post By GasHighSpeedMixer
  • 1 Post By GasHighSpeedMixer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 24, 2020, 12:41
Default Flow past circular cylinder - turbulent case
  #1
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Hii,
I am still stuck on this problem. Please help!

I am new to OpenFoam and trying to simulate flow past a circular cylinder at Re = 3900. But my drag coefficient is coming out to be very low. I have attached the required file. Please help where i am getting wrong?

I am using rhoPimpleFoam solver.
Please ask if you need to know any more data but please help.
Thanks in advance.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...Vh?usp=sharing

Last edited by tony256; June 25, 2020 at 08:42.
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2020, 15:30
Default
  #2
Member
 
Ardalan
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta, USA
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 14
Ardali is on a distinguished road
Are you using any turbulence model? If no, you are right stay with laminar.

Is it 2D case with empty boundaries in sides? If yes, that is a problem in underestimating the drag.
The only reason with low drag is coarse mesh. Meh the resolution finer in azimuthal and wall normal directions.
tony256 likes this.
Ardali is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 02:37
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardali View Post
Are you using any turbulence model? If no, you are right stay with laminar.

Is it 2D case with empty boundaries in sides? If yes, that is a problem in underestimating the drag.
The only reason with low drag is coarse mesh. Meh the resolution finer in azimuthal and wall normal directions.

yes i amusing kEqn turbulent model.

Ok, then can you suggest what BC can be used at front and back?
Thank you so much the reply.
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 09:47
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
GasHighSpeedMixer is on a distinguished road
Hi and welcome to OpenFOAM!

How do you calculate the drag? I suggest you to use functions (forceCoeff) in your controlDict, if you did not already do that. Are you sure, that Aref and lref are correct? If your case is 2D, front and back are supposed to be empty.

Kind regards
tony256 likes this.
GasHighSpeedMixer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 11:19
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by GasHighSpeedMixer View Post
Hi and welcome to OpenFOAM!

How do you calculate the drag? I suggest you to use functions (forceCoeff) in your controlDict, if you did not already do that. Are you sure, that Aref and lref are correct? If your case is 2D, front and back are supposed to be empty.

Kind regards
Hii, Thanks for your reply.
The diameter of cylinder in my case is 1.
Hence, i have set the value lref = 1 and Aref = 0.041315 (lref*pi*D/76).
This is a 3D case, still i am not getting correct results. Please see the drive link i have attached and help!.
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 12:56
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
GasHighSpeedMixer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony256 View Post
The diameter of cylinder in my case is 1.
Hence, i have set the value lref = 1 and Aref = 0.041315 (lref*pi*D/76).
This is a 3D case, still i am not getting correct results. Please see the drive link i have attached and help!.
I did a lot of airfoil simulation in the past few months to calculate lift and drag and your case is quite similar to an airfoil calculation. On the first glance it seems that you have calculated Aref wrong. In an airfoil case, lref = chord length, while Aref = lref*thickness perpendicular to lref. This means in your case Aref = 1*thickness (thickness is here the length of the cylinder). This might solve your problem.
tony256 likes this.
GasHighSpeedMixer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 14:34
Default
  #7
Member
 
Ardalan
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta, USA
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 14
Ardali is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony256 View Post
yes i amusing kEqn turbulent model.

Ok, then can you suggest what BC can be used at front and back?
Thank you so much the reply.
Is it LES k equation model?
If you are using 3D case with spanwise extension, that should be fine enough. You can find reasonable resolution in the literature.

You should know that your viscous sublayer in fully laminar. It makes you simulation tricky. conventional URANS models do not work for your case. Keep your domain large enough and resolution fine enough.
It will work.
Good luck
Ardalan
Ardali is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 16:13
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
I am still not getting correct results. Can you send me your email ID so that i can send you my case file? I am really stuck on this problem.
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 16:15
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by GasHighSpeedMixer View Post
I did a lot of airfoil simulation in the past few months to calculate lift and drag and your case is quite similar to an airfoil calculation. On the first glance it seems that you have calculated Aref wrong. In an airfoil case, lref = chord length, while Aref = lref*thickness perpendicular to lref. This means in your case Aref = 1*thickness (thickness is here the length of the cylinder). This might solve your problem.
I am still not getting correct results. Can you send me your email ID so that i can send you my case file? I am really stuck on this problem.
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2020, 17:30
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
GasHighSpeedMixer is on a distinguished road
I advise you to watch this tutorial. This should describe your case very well. So the learning effect is definitely higher:
https://youtu.be/YOT62t2IiDE
GasHighSpeedMixer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2020, 06:55
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by GasHighSpeedMixer View Post
I advise you to watch this tutorial. This should describe your case very well. So the learning effect is definitely higher:
https://youtu.be/YOT62t2IiDE
Actually Re = 3900 is not complete turbulent case. It is in transition region. I am using rhoPimpleFoam. Is the selection of Solver correct or it depends on other things?
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2020, 07:35
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
GasHighSpeedMixer is on a distinguished road
Have a look on the OpenFoam solver list:
https://www.openfoam.com/documentati...rd-solvers.php

pimpleFoam solves transient simulations and stands for the property of a parameter to follow a constant value over time.

rhoPimpleFoam takes compressible and heat transfer effects into account.

simpleFoam solves steady-state simulations.

I would recommend you to start easy and to use simpleFoam. If that works and you want to simulate something similar like the Karman Vortex Street, switch over to pimpleFoam. But I don't think that you should take compressibility (rhoPimpleFoam) into account at these low velocities.
GasHighSpeedMixer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2020, 12:44
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Mudit Mehta
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 6
tony256 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by GasHighSpeedMixer View Post
Have a look on the OpenFoam solver list:
https://www.openfoam.com/documentati...rd-solvers.php

pimpleFoam solves transient simulations and stands for the property of a parameter to follow a constant value over time.

rhoPimpleFoam takes compressible and heat transfer effects into account.

simpleFoam solves steady-state simulations.

I would recommend you to start easy and to use simpleFoam. If that works and you want to simulate something similar like the Karman Vortex Street, switch over to pimpleFoam. But I don't think that you should take compressibility (rhoPimpleFoam) into account at these low velocities.
Hey! Actually my case is a 3D problem. In this i don't think Aref = length * Diameter ?
tony256 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[DesignModeler] DesignModeler Scripting: How to get Full Command Access ANT ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 53 February 16, 2020 16:13
Turbulent flow over a circular cylinder? ck3 FLUENT 6 May 4, 2018 13:20
Turbulent flow over a circular cylinder ck3 FLUENT 3 March 3, 2015 03:44
2D flow around a circular cylinder case with interFoam solver shuoxue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 August 31, 2013 06:04
Tubulent flow past circular cylinder at Re=3900 Jinglei Main CFD Forum 1 September 11, 2007 07:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:13.