|
[Sponsors] |
Heat flux is not conserved across the boundaries |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2020, 06:44 |
Heat flux is not conserved across the boundaries
|
#1 |
New Member
CFDUSER
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
I am new to OpenFOAM. I am trying to solve 2D steady state heat conduction problem as per case setup in URL link. I have postprocessed the results in Paraview, got the correct temperature profile "but heat flux is not conserved between both the boundaries." Anyone has an idea what could be the issue? However in Ansys heat flux is conserved with the same mesh and boundary conditions. Note : Solver-laplacianFoam. To calculate heat flux at the boundaries in Paraview , I am using extract block and integrate variable options. casefile download link : https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bf...BDSFMrtYEyPR07 |
|
May 26, 2020, 06:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 369
Rep Power: 8 |
hi,
i did face a similar problem, and i believe that the calculations with openfoam are correct but paraview postprocessing misses the point somewhat. i have a pipe with two fluids, i compare the integrated velocities, which are the volume fluxes, and strangely i don't get the same values at the inlet and outlet of the pipe with paraview for those two fluids. when i postprocess w/ openfoam functions with correct weighting i get the correct results and mass is conserved. i think paraview's integrated variables doesn't use correct weighting and creates wrong answers. |
|
May 26, 2020, 06:26 |
|
#3 |
New Member
CFDUSER
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
Thank for the reply. I will try with OpenFOAM postprocessing functions. I also believe that the issue is with paraview integrating functions because i got all the other results correct. As far as your case is concern (Pipe flow with two fluids), Paraview calculates correct fluxes as I have checked flux conservation in some pipe flow cases. Could you provide your case just to check flux conservation in paraview ? |
|
May 27, 2020, 02:55 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 369
Rep Power: 8 |
in my case i'm using a multiphase solver, so there is the void fraction involved.
when i integrate the velocity, normally i should get the flux, but the void fraction weighting is not considered, so just by comparing those integrated velocities i don't get the correct volume flux. paraview doesn't take this into account. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Total heat transf. rate vs Total surface heat flux | Renato Sousa | FLUENT | 1 | April 14, 2020 04:27 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Conjugate Heat Transfer: Wall Heat Flux at Coupled Walls? | MaxHeat | FLUENT | 4 | September 14, 2017 11:44 |
Udf for moving heat flux in 2D cylindrical geometry | devia21 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | April 20, 2015 01:27 |
Heat Flux Profile at Fluid-Porous Interface | Hitch8 | CFX | 4 | December 15, 2012 10:57 |