|
[Sponsors] |
reactingFoam stops at the beginning without error message |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 21, 2019, 06:30 |
reactingFoam stops at the beginning without error message
|
#1 |
New Member
Slim
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello everybody,
I am trying to run a combustion simulation using reactingFoam, however when I start the calculation it loads the solvers and other parameters and that's it. It stops whitout any error message. I am not really what you can call an expert of OpenFoam, so maybe I am missing an obvious thing but I am quite lost. So, thank you for your time and help. This is what I get: Code:
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ ========= | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox \\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org \\ / A nd | Version: 6 \\/ M anipulation | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Build : 6-d3fd147e6c65 Exec : reactingFoam Date : Feb 21 2019 Time : 11:13:28 Host : "DESKTOP-U8LEB3K" PID : 619 I/O : uncollated Case : /mnt/d/USN/4th_semester/test/turbulent_combustion nProcs : 1 sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE). fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10) allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create mesh for time = 0 PIMPLE: No convergence criteria found PIMPLE: Operating solver in PISO mode Using LTS Reading thermophysical properties Selecting thermodynamics package { type hePsiThermo; mixture reactingMixture; transport sutherland; thermo janaf; energy sensibleEnthalpy; equationOfState perfectGas; specie specie; } Selecting chemistryReader foamChemistryReader Reading field U Reading/calculating face flux field phi Creating turbulence model. Selecting turbulence model type RAS Selecting RAS turbulence model kEpsilon kEpsilonCoeffs { Prt 0.85; Cmu 0.09; C1 1.44; C2 1.92; C3 0; sigmak 1; sigmaEps 1.3; } Creating reaction model Selecting combustion model EDC Selecting chemistry solver { solver ode; method TDAC; } StandardChemistryModel: Number of species = 5 and reactions = 1 Selecting chemistry reduction method DAC Selecting chemistry tabulation method ISAT Selecting ODE solver seulex using integrated reaction rate Creating field dpdt Creating field kinetic energy K No MRF models present No finite volume options present Starting time loop Time scales min/max: Flow = 0.0001, 0.0001 |
|
February 17, 2021, 17:04 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Evren Yilmaz Yakin
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I have the same problem. My version is v2012. |
|
February 18, 2021, 16:55 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Herpes Free Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: The Home Under The Ground with the Lost Boys
Posts: 931
Rep Power: 13 |
Would it be possible for you to reproduce the issue with a minimal working example, so that we can reproduce the issue locally?
__________________
The OpenFOAM community is the biggest contributor to OpenFOAM: User guide/Wiki-1/Wiki-2/Code guide/Code Wiki/Journal Nilsson/Guerrero/Holzinger/Holzmann/Nagy/Santos/Nozaki/Jasak/Primer Governance Bugs/Features: OpenFOAM (ESI-OpenCFD-Trademark) Bugs/Features: FOAM-Extend (Wikki-FSB) Bugs: OpenFOAM.org How to create a MWE New: Forkable OpenFOAM mirror |
|
February 19, 2021, 06:26 |
|
#4 |
Member
Franco Marra
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Napoli - Italy
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Sosos,
how did you launch your run? By using scripts (like Allrun) or redirecting the output on file, in my experience it can happen that the last lines of the output can be missed, preventing the possibility to see in which part of the code the error is occurring. Try to launch reactingFoam without arguments directly (interactively) on the command line to see if further messages arise. And of course, as indicated by HPE, it is impossible to have an idea of what is happening knowing nothing of what you changed starting from a working tutorial. Regards, Francesco |
|
February 25, 2021, 16:53 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Evren Yilmaz Yakin
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi Francesco,
Hi HPE, I think sosos may have stopped following this topic. He created this start of 2019. But I can't pass this step. I solved the SandiaD_LTS tutorial normally. After this solution, I imported without using Allrun a different model using ideasUnvToFoam and I changed boundary conditions to suit my model in 0 folder. After the changes, i runned chemkinToFoam, setFields and reactingFoam. The solver not runned because of this warning Code:
Invalid wall function specification Patch type for patch wall must be wall Current patch type is patch Finally, I re-runned the setFields and reactingFoam and I attached the response as below. Meanwhile, thinking there might be a difference, I changed the version from 2012 to 8. Code:
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ ========= | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox \\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org \\ / A nd | Version: 8 \\/ M anipulation | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Build : 8-340defec456f Exec : reactingFoam Date : Feb 25 2021 Time : 23:49:04 Host : "host" PID : 4908 I/O : uncollated Case : /mnt/d/OF/x1/x1 nProcs : 1 sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE). fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10) allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create mesh for time = 0 PIMPLE: No convergence criteria found PIMPLE: Operating solver in transient mode with 1 outer corrector PIMPLE: Operating solver in PISO mode Using LTS Reading thermophysical properties Selecting thermodynamics package { type hePsiThermo; mixture multiComponentMixture; transport sutherland; thermo janaf; energy sensibleEnthalpy; equationOfState perfectGas; specie specie; } Reading field U Reading/calculating face flux field phi Creating turbulence model. Selecting turbulence model type RAS Selecting RAS turbulence model kEpsilon RAS { model kEpsilon; turbulence on; printCoeffs on; Cmu 0.09; C1 1.44; C2 1.92; C3 0; sigmak 1; sigmaEps 1.3; } Creating thermophysical transport model Selecting thermophysical transport type RAS Selecting default RAS thermophysical transport model eddyDiffusivity Creating reaction model Selecting combustion model EDC Selecting chemistry solver { solver ode; method TDAC; } StandardChemistryModel: Number of species = 36 and reactions = 219 Selecting chemistry reduction method DAC element not considered Selecting chemistry tabulation method ISAT Selecting ODE solver seulex using integrated reaction rate Creating field dpdt Creating field kinetic energy K No MRF models present Creating finite volume options from "constant/fvOptions" Selecting finite volume options model type radiation Source: radiation Selecting radiationModel P1 Selecting absorptionEmissionModel greyMeanCombustion Selecting scatterModel none Selecting soot model none Starting time loop Time scales min/max: Flow = 0.0001, 0.0001 |
|
February 26, 2021, 05:41 |
|
#6 |
Member
Franco Marra
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Napoli - Italy
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Evren,
it is very difficult to debug this error without knowing the entire setup of the simulation. From your output, it seems that the error occurs while computing the time scales for the temperature (the next line in the log should be something similar to Temperature = 4.494232837e+307, 4.494232837e+307 ). I would try to have a uniform initial temperature field without setting a hot zone (the setField command) for the ignition to check if the problem is in the setting of the ignition hot zone. Maybe, by changing the domain and mesh type, some inconsistency occurred. Best regards, Francesco |
|
February 28, 2021, 11:15 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Evren Yilmaz Yakin
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi again,
I checked Temperature fields, tried to close radiation and solve without allrun script, but I can't changed anything. In addition I searched "Time scales min/max:" and i found in setRDeltaT.H file. I added a debug code below alphaTemp and alphaY statements. When I change the codes in that file, shouldn't the text I get on the screen change? I want to see a difference and changed the code from Info<< " Flow = " to Info<< " Flo = " , but it didn't change. I added the simulation files as below. Model If you have a suitable time, Would you be able to examine it, please? Regards,
__________________
Best Regards, Evren Last edited by evrenykn; February 28, 2021 at 15:41. Reason: added some details. |
|
March 6, 2021, 15:14 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Herpes Free Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: The Home Under The Ground with the Lost Boys
Posts: 931
Rep Power: 13 |
Can you run a test by switching off the chemistry/combustion?
If that runs, could you run the case without TDAC (hence just using ODE)? Then if everything is fine, still let the flow develop a bit without jumping into the chemistry (which is a bit painful to my experience).
__________________
The OpenFOAM community is the biggest contributor to OpenFOAM: User guide/Wiki-1/Wiki-2/Code guide/Code Wiki/Journal Nilsson/Guerrero/Holzinger/Holzmann/Nagy/Santos/Nozaki/Jasak/Primer Governance Bugs/Features: OpenFOAM (ESI-OpenCFD-Trademark) Bugs/Features: FOAM-Extend (Wikki-FSB) Bugs: OpenFOAM.org How to create a MWE New: Forkable OpenFOAM mirror |
|
March 7, 2021, 14:34 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Evren Yilmaz Yakin
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi HPE,
I tried to turn off chemistry. Unfortunately, it didn't solve.
__________________
Best Regards, Evren |
|
March 7, 2021, 16:49 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Herpes Free Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: The Home Under The Ground with the Lost Boys
Posts: 931
Rep Power: 13 |
So, one point (chemistry/combustion) has already been isolated out.
Keep switching off the submodules further till the case is OK for the first time, or debug the solver with the simulation you have (this involves coding/compilation etc).
__________________
The OpenFOAM community is the biggest contributor to OpenFOAM: User guide/Wiki-1/Wiki-2/Code guide/Code Wiki/Journal Nilsson/Guerrero/Holzinger/Holzmann/Nagy/Santos/Nozaki/Jasak/Primer Governance Bugs/Features: OpenFOAM (ESI-OpenCFD-Trademark) Bugs/Features: FOAM-Extend (Wikki-FSB) Bugs: OpenFOAM.org How to create a MWE New: Forkable OpenFOAM mirror |
|
March 23, 2021, 15:50 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Evren Yilmaz Yakin
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi again,
I solved the problem but I don't know how I solved it. I re-created the project in a new folder and I checked from start line by line. The solver started.
__________________
Best Regards, Evren |
|
March 23, 2024, 18:30 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Bk
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello all,
I know, this is old thread, but my issue is similar. My solver crashed after just starting the 1st iteration and like above mentioned(francescomarra: also temperature something 1e+300). by the way, I have tried most of suggestions like turning off chemsitry, radiation, and also disabling setfields. those didn't work out. HereI am adding screenshot. Best Regards, Last edited by Bk12345; March 24, 2024 at 04:25. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to switch off combustion and reaction in reactingFoam | shenzhou1987 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | October 26, 2017 16:31 |
strange processor boundary behavior in foam-extend reactingFOAM | Neka | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | August 16, 2017 08:13 |
calculate flame speed using reactingFoam | IColin | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 4, 2014 16:14 |
reactingFoam wedge handling wrong U | dhondupant | OpenFOAM Bugs | 1 | December 9, 2010 08:34 |
reactingFoam - turbulent reacting flow | hamburgFoam | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 7, 2009 13:57 |