|
[Sponsors] |
More parcels stuck than there have been in the system |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 9, 2018, 08:00 |
More parcels stuck than there have been in the system
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi all,
I am trying to run a simulation where parcels are manually injected into the flow, using some randomly generated position within the domain. The number of parcels does not change during the simulation and I want to keep track of the parcels that stick to either a building or the ground. After some time, all parcels either stick or they escaped through the domain boundaries. The weird thing is that the cumulative number of stuck parcels increases during the simulation, where it seems that stuck parcels are counted over and over again. This seems incorrect, or is this behavior expected? I can work with escaping parcels at these boundaries, which does seem to work ok as at least the numbers add up, but for visualisation, I rather have stuck parcels. I used icoUncoupledKinematicParcelFoam from version 1806 with a flow field calculated using simpleFoam. Code:
Time = 0.995 Evolving kinematicCloud Solving 3-D cloud kinematicCloud Cloud: kinematicCloud Current number of parcels = 143545 Current mass in system = 0.531278 Linear momentum = (0 0 0) |Linear momentum| = 0 Linear kinetic energy = 0 Injector model1: - parcels added = 226800 - mass introduced = 0.571889 Parcel fate: system (number, mass) - escape = 83255, 0.0406116 Parcel fate: patch Building (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 12637052, 38.7247 Parcel fate: patch Ground (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 66708034, 264.427 Parcel fate: patch Top (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 0, 0 Parcel fate: patch Domain (number, mass) - escape = 83255, 0.0406116 - stick = 0, 0 Rotational kinetic energy = 0 ExecutionTime = 506.1 s ClockTime = 509 s Time = 1 Evolving kinematicCloud Solving 3-D cloud kinematicCloud Cloud: kinematicCloud Current number of parcels = 143545 Current mass in system = 0.531278 Linear momentum = (0 0 0) |Linear momentum| = 0 Linear kinetic energy = 0 Injector model1: - parcels added = 226800 - mass introduced = 0.571889 Parcel fate: system (number, mass) - escape = 83255, 0.0406116 Parcel fate: patch Building (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 12712904, 38.9585 Parcel fate: patch Ground (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 67206362, 266.319 Parcel fate: patch Top (number, mass) - escape = 0, 0 - stick = 0, 0 Parcel fate: patch Domain (number, mass) - escape = 83255, 0.0406116 - stick = 0, 0 Rotational kinetic energy = 0 ExecutionTime = 510.32 s ClockTime = 513 s Code:
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: v1806 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Build : v1806 Arch : "LSB;label=32;scalar=64" Exec : checkMesh Date : Aug 08 2018 Time : 15:26:14 Host : "acticom19" PID : 7698 I/O : uncollated Case : /home/tom/Projecten/Amsterdam_Zuidoost/CFD/test_Rain nProcs : 1 trapFpe: Floating point exception trapping enabled (FOAM_SIGFPE). fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster (fileModificationSkew 10) allowSystemOperations : Allowing user-supplied system call operations // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create mesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 10736 faces: 29175 internal faces: 26325 cells: 9250 faces per cell: 6 boundary patches: 4 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 1 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 9250 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology Building 125 136 ok (non-closed singly connected) Domain 1500 1600 ok (non-closed singly connected) Top 625 676 ok (non-closed singly connected) Ground 600 660 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking faceZone topology for multiply connected surfaces... No faceZones found. Checking basic cellZone addressing... CellZone Cells Points BoundingBox air 9250 10736 (-2.5 -2.5 0) (2.5 2.5 3) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-2.5 -2.5 0) (2.5 2.5 3) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-3.98329e-16 1.17073e-16 1.14413e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 2.60209e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 1.04037 OK. Minimum face area = 0.0383851. Maximum face area = 0.0416151. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 0.00782842. Max volume = 0.00817158. Total volume = 74. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 1.93496 average: 0.0355807 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 0.0207819 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End Regards, Tom |
|
April 30, 2019, 07:11 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi all,
Just an update on the issue. I could not fix the problem using OpenFOAM version 1806. Using the escaped particles did work for the solution of the engineering question. Lately I have had a different project with particles that could stick to walls and I solved that with OpenFOAM v6. There the behavior was as expected. I did not check how version 1812 would behave. Cheers, Tom |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Remeshing_ ANSYS 14.0_ System Coupling | acdesa | ANSYS | 4 | November 2, 2016 10:12 |
Problem with exporting solution data concerning the coordinate System | elbi_ente | Structural Mechanics | 0 | October 9, 2015 02:49 |
Coupling inlet and outlets massfluxes in an enclosed circulation system | NielsB | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 8, 2015 06:26 |
System Build Advice for FEA | cycleback | Hardware | 1 | February 8, 2013 21:53 |
Difference in settings between icoFoam and icoLagrangianFoam | Alexvader | OpenFOAM | 1 | October 4, 2011 20:21 |