|
[Sponsors] |
January 10, 2018, 12:21 |
Waterfall-dissipation well simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Jose Diaz
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Medellín, Colombia.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Dear forum,
We are currently testing a simulation that involves a multiphase flow (Water and air), basically is a rectangular channel that ultimately leads to a dissipation well: The current setup, which uses InterDyMFoam as solver is limited to a CFL number of 1, is able to somewhat represent the expected behavior of the flow with a peak velocity of ~50 m/s in the main channel, unfortunately in the waterfall zone that has an elevation delta of ~200m (where the fluid separates from the channel and falls to the dissipation well), the dynamic mesh chases small particles of water that are quite spread from the main flow, increasing cells count and hence computation time significantly because the time step to model this behavior, unnecessary for our goals, and maintain the desired CFL number is sitting at 7e-4 s (which is a no-go). We have already tried limiting the maximum cell count for the dynamic mesh with no success. I was wondering, is InterDyMFoam a good choice for this type of simulation or is there another way (solver, procedure…) to tackle this model? We would greatly appreciate any suggestion. Kind regards, José D. |
|
January 15, 2018, 08:26 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
In the DynamicMeshDict you can also limit the number of refinement steps. Alternatively you can mesh your model uniformly but in my mind it usually is better to use Dynamic mesh sizing like in InterDyMFoam. |
||
January 26, 2018, 08:47 |
|
#3 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
Hope that Medellin is nice to be. I am going to that place soon
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
||
January 27, 2018, 05:04 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Santiago Lopez Castano
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 354
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Then, if you have the time, you should go to Rionegro and Guatape. These are two villages close to Medellin. You will not regret. Foods to eat: pandeyuca and pandebono (like a Brioche, but not quite). Bunuelos (very similar to the german quarkballchen or italian frittelle, but again not quite). If you are up to eating A LOT, you may try the "bandeja paisa" (similar to the Irish Breakfast). Thats it. Have fun. |
||
January 27, 2018, 15:14 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Thanks for replying to the Medellin stuff. Sounds great - I should invite you on a beer. However, to kinneas, there could be another option too. You could use my extended library in order to refine the interface higher while keeping the internal droplet coarse. That just came into my mind. My extended library is hosted on my server https://holzmann-cfd.de
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
|
January 29, 2018, 10:38 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Jose Diaz
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Medellín, Colombia.
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Thank you for responses. Currently we switched to a standard mesh with a different refinement taking into account our previous results, things look a little bit more promising than using a dynamic mesh, fortunately we still have some resources left to tune and play a little bit more with this case. We'll take a deep look at the resources hosted in your web page! Kind regards, José Díaz. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some questions about flow boiling simulation in Fluent | beastieboys6 | FLUENT | 8 | November 21, 2017 00:47 |
Surface Source - Fixed Temperature? | robtheslob | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 18 | May 12, 2017 03:28 |
Simulation FPEs - turbulence for transient and steady-state? | DaveR | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | March 5, 2017 16:06 |
Dissipation rate access | K. Kevala | FLUENT | 0 | July 14, 2004 12:11 |
TKE SPECTRUM & DISSIPATION | Christian Paukert | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 14, 2001 20:34 |