CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Turbulence models

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Flowkersma

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 23, 2017, 10:16
Default Turbulence models
  #1
New Member
 
Gebregziabher
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9
gerie is on a distinguished road
Dear Respected members,

Since I am new to CFD simulations, I got a problem:-
1. When I run my case [k-epsilon turbulence model], I got a warning message, see the attached photo. What could be the possible mistake I made? I can not post process it (I can’t see any thing on the para-view).
2.What is the distinction that I get on the velocity profile after using turbulence model and the velocity profile I get with out using the turbulence model?

Kind regards,
Gerie

Last edited by gerie; December 1, 2017 at 13:35.
gerie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 23, 2017, 11:46
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Mikko
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Posts: 243
Rep Power: 13
Flowkersma is on a distinguished road
Hi Gerie,

1. Seems like you are trying to link dynamically a library (swak4Foam) which you do not have installed. If you do not need swak4Foam, just remove the libs entry in system/controlDict which should look something like this:

Code:
    
libs 
    ( 
      "libOpenFOAM.so"
      "libsimpleSwakFunctionObjects.so"
      "libswakFunctionObjects.so"
      "libgroovyBC.so"
    );
2. If the turbulence model that you are using is perfect (it is not), then the velocity profiles should look the same. Otherwise, the difference is the modeling error induced by the turbulence model. Obviously, I assume that you are doing things right so for instance you have adequate mesh resolution for the simulation without turbulence model (DNS).

Regards, Mikko
gerie likes this.
Flowkersma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2017, 10:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Gebregziabher
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9
gerie is on a distinguished road
Dear Mikko,
Thank you so much, it works!
Kind regards,
Gerie
gerie is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
different zones, different turbulence models gmwsy FLUENT 5 June 17, 2020 16:42
Adding turbulence models to (reacting)TwoPhaseEulerFoam lavdwall OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 3, 2017 04:04
y+ range for turbulence models babri FLUENT 1 August 30, 2016 18:39
Zero Equation Turbulence models stefan.gracik OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 April 17, 2013 15:12
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 10:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14.