|
[Sponsors] |
twoPhaseEulerFoam vs multiPhaseEulerFoam vs reactingEulerFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 7, 2017, 17:28 |
twoPhaseEulerFoam vs multiPhaseEulerFoam vs reactingEulerFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi all,
I'm currently using and extending twoPhaseEulerFoam for nuclear applications. However, i've seen many other similar solvers, such as multiPhaseEulerFoam and the reactiveEulerFoam solvers. Is there one among them which might be more robust that the other? Moreover, with twoPhaseEulerFoam i noticed that when i restart the simulation I have some oscillations of the flow rate, even if i previously reached steady-state. That's not a big deal, but every time I have to restart, I also have to wait a few minuts till the oscillations die out. Again, may the other EulerFoam solvers be of help? |
|
July 7, 2017, 18:07 |
|
#2 |
Member
Juho Peltola
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 |
twoPhaseEulerFoam is a legacy solver that is being replaced with reactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam which can do everything twoPhaseEulerFoam can do and more (or less i.e. leave out energy equations).
Also note that reactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam has boiling and condensation models typically used in nuclear applications. If you work on these solvers I recommend that you use OpenFOAM-dev. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
twoPhaseEulerFoam: sudden crash | hcen | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | September 29, 2020 04:04 |
multiphaseEulerFoam + kineticTheoryProperties | vasava | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | May 20, 2020 11:35 |
twoPhaseEulerFoam fluidized bed wrong results | FabianB | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 14, 2017 04:48 |
Is twoPhaseEulerFoam applicable to 3D cases / delivering erroneous results? | ThomasV | OpenFOAM | 0 | November 11, 2013 09:10 |
twoPhaseEulerFoam | freemankofi | OpenFOAM | 0 | May 23, 2011 17:24 |