|
[Sponsors] |
Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 6, 2016, 03:55 |
Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi All,
Is it possible use chtMultiRegionFoam problem for porous media flow??. if so, how to specify interface boundary condition for U, p_rgh etc in porous media??. Presently I created a case file having 3regions with one region assuming to be porous. In region properties I choose porous as a fluid region then I added fvOptions to add porous region properties. Case file is running perfectly but from the results I see that this resistance is not added. could you please tell me why this is not taking?? Regards, Bibin Last edited by bibin.sme; August 9, 2016 at 01:42. |
|
January 18, 2017, 02:37 |
Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam
|
#2 |
New Member
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear all,
I have a case where one region is a porous region and the other is a clear fluid region. The problem i'm facing is the interface boundary conditions . The interface has to satisfy boundary conditions for U, shear stress, T, and heat flux. How do I create these boundary conditions as coupled BC's or is there any other way to get rid of this issue?? please help me.... Regards, Bibin |
|
January 1, 2018, 20:12 |
|
#3 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Quick answer: Although I'm really late here, the solution is simple enough: porous region cannot be a separate region, it must be part of the complete fluid region that is connected to the porous region.
Edit: See the tutorial case "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam/heatExchanger"
__________________
Last edited by wyldckat; January 1, 2018 at 20:12. Reason: see "Edit:" |
|
April 25, 2018, 01:27 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Bruno,
The Problem I'm trying to solve is heat pipe using chtMultiRegionFoam. This Problem is having 3 regions (wall, wick & vapour core). The major difficulty I'm facing is the interface b/w the wick & vapour region as its an interface of two fluid regions with phase change. Can u please suggest some solution to this problem. Regards, Bibin |
|
April 30, 2018, 18:12 |
|
#5 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Bibin,
Phase change is a whole other type of solver... unfortunately the solvers chtMultiRegionFoam and chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam cannot handle phase change. I'm not familiar with anyone having made public a modified solver of these two that can handle phase changes as well. What is more important to simulate for your problem:
Bruno
__________________
|
|
May 4, 2018, 05:37 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks Bruno,
Let me try the links what you send first. Regards, Bibin |
|
August 6, 2018, 09:43 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Alejandro
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Argentina
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Why a porous region can not be a separate region?. If you consider a solid porous and a fluid passing trought it. You need to solve different equations for each one and heat transfer between them. Am I missing something? Regards |
||
August 17, 2018, 17:21 |
|
#8 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Quote:
Quick answer: Study the tutorial case "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/heatExchanger" in OpenFOAM 6 or "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam/heatExchanger" in OF 5 and older. I haven't studied this tutorial case myself and the porous part is indeed in a separate region. However, even if your porous region is made of a solid fabric/material, the problem is that you still need fluid crossing it. This means that you need the non-porous fluid region to transfer fluid back and forth through the porous region. And if not done correctly, you get two separate regions that do not exchange fluid, only heat.
__________________
|
||
April 27, 2020, 11:12 |
|
#9 |
Member
James
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Bruno,
I need to set up a condition on the interface (using internal patch or somehow) but I couldn't figure out how is this possible. Could you please advise. I need a source term for my momentum equation which is obtained by solving the the Maxwell's equation for elctric potential. The BC needed to solve this equation {as shown} should satisfy on top of metal surface. If there was only metal phase, I wouldnot have problem to set up this BC. But now I have metal phase & Gas phase (interfoam based two-phase solver) and I can't apply this condition on the top surface (of gas) anymore. How do I apply this condition on the interface boundary? I only need to solve for this equation once outside the time loop. The generated source term for momentum equation after solving this equation will remain constant for simplicity. I have attached a graphics of the domain for easier understanding. Thanks! Last edited by Madeinspace; April 27, 2020 at 11:27. Reason: picture didn't appear |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Low torque values on Screw Turbine | Shaun Waters | CFX | 34 | July 23, 2015 09:16 |
CFX doesn't continue calculation... | mactech001 | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2009 22:25 |
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) | Young | CFX | 5 | October 7, 2008 00:17 |
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair | lego | CFX | 3 | November 5, 2002 21:09 |