CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By bibin.sme
  • 1 Post By wyldckat

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2016, 03:55
Question Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
bibin.sme is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

Is it possible use chtMultiRegionFoam problem for porous media flow??. if so, how to specify interface boundary condition for U, p_rgh etc in porous media??.

Presently I created a case file having 3regions with one region assuming to be porous. In region properties I choose porous as a fluid region then I added fvOptions to add porous region properties. Case file is running perfectly but from the results I see that this resistance is not added. could you please tell me why this is not taking??


Regards,
Bibin

Last edited by bibin.sme; August 9, 2016 at 01:42.
bibin.sme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2017, 02:37
Question Interface boundary conditions in chtMultiRegionFoam
  #2
New Member
 
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
bibin.sme is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I have a case where one region is a porous region and the other is a clear fluid region. The problem i'm facing is the interface boundary conditions . The interface has to satisfy boundary conditions for U, shear stress, T, and heat flux. How do I create these boundary conditions as coupled BC's or is there any other way to get rid of this issue??

please help me....

Regards,
Bibin
bibin.sme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 1, 2018, 20:12
Default
  #3
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Quick answer: Although I'm really late here, the solution is simple enough: porous region cannot be a separate region, it must be part of the complete fluid region that is connected to the porous region.

Edit: See the tutorial case "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam/heatExchanger"
__________________

Last edited by wyldckat; January 1, 2018 at 20:12. Reason: see "Edit:"
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2018, 01:27
Question
  #4
New Member
 
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
bibin.sme is on a distinguished road
Hi Bruno,

The Problem I'm trying to solve is heat pipe using chtMultiRegionFoam. This Problem is having 3 regions (wall, wick & vapour core). The major difficulty I'm facing is the interface b/w the wick & vapour region as its an interface of two fluid regions with phase change.

Can u please suggest some solution to this problem.

Regards,
Bibin
Kummi likes this.
bibin.sme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2018, 18:12
Default
  #5
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Hi Bibin,

Phase change is a whole other type of solver... unfortunately the solvers chtMultiRegionFoam and chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam cannot handle phase change. I'm not familiar with anyone having made public a modified solver of these two that can handle phase changes as well.

What is more important to simulate for your problem:
  1. Does the wall have to be physically modeled? For example, do you need to see the changes in temperature along the wall sections?
  2. Does the wick need to be physically modeled? Or is the outside surface of the wick really important?
Because if you only want a liquid changing phase to a vapour, after being in contact with a hot medium or hot surface, then there are already solvers for that... if I can remember which ones it is... mmmm... a bit of Googling and I only found a couple of threads relevant to this topic:

Best regards,
Bruno
Kummi likes this.
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2018, 05:37
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Bibin K.S
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12
bibin.sme is on a distinguished road
Thanks Bruno,


Let me try the links what you send first.

Regards,
Bibin
bibin.sme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2018, 09:43
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Alejandro
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Argentina
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 12
ancolli is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyldckat View Post
Quick answer: Although I'm really late here, the solution is simple enough: porous region cannot be a separate region, it must be part of the complete fluid region that is connected to the porous region.

Edit: See the tutorial case "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam/heatExchanger"
Dear Bruno,
Why a porous region can not be a separate region?. If you consider a solid porous and a fluid passing trought it. You need to solve different equations for each one and heat transfer between them. Am I missing something?

Regards
ancolli is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2018, 17:21
Default
  #8
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by ancolli View Post
Why a porous region can not be a separate region?. If you consider a solid porous and a fluid passing trought it. You need to solve different equations for each one and heat transfer between them. Am I missing something?

Quick answer: Study the tutorial case "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/heatExchanger" in OpenFOAM 6 or "heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam/heatExchanger" in OF 5 and older.
I haven't studied this tutorial case myself and the porous part is indeed in a separate region.


However, even if your porous region is made of a solid fabric/material, the problem is that you still need fluid crossing it. This means that you need the non-porous fluid region to transfer fluid back and forth through the porous region. And if not done correctly, you get two separate regions that do not exchange fluid, only heat.
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2020, 11:12
Default
  #9
Member
 
James
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 12
Madeinspace is on a distinguished road
Hi Bruno,


I need to set up a condition on the interface (using internal patch or somehow) but I couldn't figure out how is this possible. Could you please advise.



I need a source term for my momentum equation which is obtained by solving the the Maxwell's equation for elctric potential. The BC needed to solve this equation {as shown} should satisfy on top of metal surface. If there was only metal phase, I wouldnot have problem to set up this BC. But now I have metal phase & Gas phase (interfoam based two-phase solver) and I can't apply this condition on the top surface (of gas) anymore. How do I apply this condition on the interface boundary? I only need to solve for this equation once outside the time loop. The generated source term for momentum equation after solving this equation will remain constant for simplicity.


I have attached a graphics of the domain for easier understanding.



Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BC.jpg (86.0 KB, 40 views)

Last edited by Madeinspace; April 27, 2020 at 11:27. Reason: picture didn't appear
Madeinspace is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 08:30
Low torque values on Screw Turbine Shaun Waters CFX 34 July 23, 2015 09:16
CFX doesn't continue calculation... mactech001 CFX 6 November 15, 2009 22:25
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) Young CFX 5 October 7, 2008 00:17
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:17.