|
[Sponsors] |
volume conservation and accurate interface shape |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 7, 2015, 10:59 |
volume conservation and accurate interface shape
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi All,
I am trying to solve a multiphase problem in which a spherical (3D) drop deforms in a surrounding fluid under certain body&interface forces. I am using interDyMFoam to solve this problem. To get an accurate interface shape, I let the program ran for a few steps and the interface looks OK to me. (see attached) However, the problem is that I got none-zero velocity magnitude on the interface, even though no external forces are present. (as shown in attached plot) I don't know why this is the case. I think the interface shape is smooth enough not to induce interface tension driven velocities. Another problem I found is that, when I run the simulation with certain body force and check the interface deformation after some time, I found that the volume of the sphere seem to be shrinking. I wonder if this is caused by the interface not being accurately captured, or some other errors? I appreciate any comments and suggestions. Thank you! -P |
|
May 7, 2015, 20:21 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Just want to mention that the volume change is not really large, but my calculations require much higher accuracy.
|
|
May 12, 2015, 09:05 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Mihai Pruna
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 16 |
VOF methods suffer from interface smearing.
Check out this paper and follow the references for the interface sharpening model. http://www.djs.si/proc/nene2011/pdf/802.pdf
__________________
Mihai Pruna's Bio |
|
May 12, 2015, 10:18 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Yogesh Bapat
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello ,
If you are using surface tension these velocities can appear as a result of parasitic current. You can read about it, as it is well reported phenomenon with VOF model. Regards, -Yogesh |
|
May 12, 2015, 22:59 |
|
#5 |
Member
Michael Page
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I had a problem similar than yours. It was with a very slow velocity at the interface and spurious currents were appearing after a some seconds. I succeed to resolve my problem by changing default schemes to linear schemes. But, it'll probably not be sufficient for your case. Recently, they add a face-based momentum equation to help with this problem. You can give a try with the last development version via GIT. https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...777bb10a3e1dda Good luck |
|
May 13, 2015, 10:42 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply! I will try Weller's new method, it looks promising. I would also like to try your ways of using the linear schemes. I think most of the schemes I am using now are different forms of linear schemes . Here is my fvSchemes file (same as default): Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { div(rhoPhi,U) Gauss upwind; div(phi,alpha) Gauss vanLeer; div(phirb,alpha) Gauss linear; div((muEff*dev(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p_rgh; pcorr; } -P |
||
May 13, 2015, 10:48 |
|
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply! I did some search and found that this is has been a problem in many simulations... Looks like I need some special treatment for the interface. Best, -P |
||
May 13, 2015, 10:51 |
|
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for your link! The two references they cited showed very good results of volume conservation. I may need to do some work to implement that. Thanks! -P |
||
May 13, 2015, 11:04 |
|
#9 |
Member
Michael Page
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Prosper,
You can try theses change div(rhoPhi,U) Gauss linear; div(phi,alpha) Gauss vanLeer01; div(phirb,alpha) Gauss interfaceCompression; Best regards, |
|
May 14, 2015, 10:47 |
|
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for your help! I tried this and found that the interface velocity has a smaller magnitude than before. But I would still get a nonsmooth interface shape after some time. Also, I still observed the total volume of the sphere expanding after certain time. Even where the velocity is almost zero, the interface could still be moving. Don't know exactly why. I'll try other ways that can possibly preserve the volume. Thanks. -P |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
Finite Difference Vs. Finite Volume | elankov | Main CFD Forum | 43 | December 18, 2010 17:30 |
finite volume | daniel | Main CFD Forum | 17 | April 11, 2005 21:36 |