CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

AMI: Minimum patch weight decreases with time

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By lordvon

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 31, 2013, 22:41
Default AMI: Minimum patch weight decreases with time
  #1
Senior Member
 
Robert
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 16
lordvon is on a distinguished road
Hello all,
I have a problem with using AMI with pimpleDyMFoam. Everything appears to run smoothly at every iteration and converges nicely, however the minimum patch weight creeps lower and lower. At the outset of the simulation the minimum patch weight is at a reasonable 0.97 or so. After each iteration it will go down something like 0.01, and eventually the minimum patch weight is so low tending toward zero that the simulation finally diverges. The average and maximum patch weights stay at reasonable near-1 values.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Thanks.

Last edited by lordvon; September 1, 2013 at 00:21.
lordvon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2013, 11:54
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Robert
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 16
lordvon is on a distinguished road
Is there a way to procure more detailed information about the patch weights? Like where they occur?
lordvon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2013, 13:39
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Robert
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 16
lordvon is on a distinguished road
SOLVED!

If you have AMI patch weight problems, the first thing to do is make sure checkMesh is happy via:

Code:
checkMesh -constant -allTopology -allGeometry
My problem was 'underdetermined cells', This occurs if too many faces of a cell have prescribed boundary conditions. My case was 2D, so front and back faces were of the 'empty' BC. I had some cells that were sandwiched in between a stator wall and the AMI interface (on the same cell), so this left only 2 of 6 faces of these cells to be internal. When I refined the cells in this region so that there were at least 3 internal faces to each cell, the checkMesh error went away and so did the patch weight problems.

You can check is this is the case in ParaView by including sets (one of the checkboxes on the main panel when you first open 'paraFoam'), then selecting from 'Mesh Parts' the 'underdeterminedCells' (and any other error sets of your interest that checkMesh may have written out).
decanter likes this.
lordvon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 March 28, 2016 12:08
Problem with cyclic boundaries in Openfoam 1.5 fs82 OpenFOAM 36 January 7, 2015 01:31
[GAMBIT] periodic faces not matching Aadhavan ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 August 31, 2013 12:25
Cyclic Boundary Condition Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 36 July 2, 2012 13:23
[Other] StarToFoam error Kart OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 4, 2010 05:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42.