|
[Sponsors] |
Can I use simpleFOAM as a transient solver ?! |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 2, 2013, 02:42 |
Can I use simpleFOAM as a transient solver ?!
|
#1 |
Member
Amin
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 13 |
I would like to use SIMPLE algorithm for transit simulation.
My problem : I could not use IcoFoam oder PiscoFoam..because the the solvers are crashing. (the mesh could be the reason). So i thought, i run a simulation as a steady case ( to stabilyse the case ) using simpleFoam, after some seconds, i want to run the simulation as transient case.. Normally for the steady-case, we use : Code:
ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } Code:
ddtSchemes { default Euler; } Thank you |
|
August 2, 2013, 03:00 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lieven
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 299
Rep Power: 22 |
Changing the ddtSchemes-entry wouldn't affect your simulation at all. The momentum equation in the simpleFoam solver does not include the time derivative so the ddtSchems-entry is even not used.
In principle you could add the time derivative to the equation, but with the simple algorithm you will always be stuck with under relaxation. So you cannot do proper time integration. So use the piso algorithm for transient simulations. Cheers, L |
|
August 2, 2013, 08:24 |
|
#3 |
Member
Amin
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks Lieven
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison | DanM | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | January 31, 2020 16:26 |
time step and iterations in steady state problem using transient solver | jing113cn | FLUENT | 2 | January 15, 2010 04:18 |
inlet boundary condition for simplefoam solver | mcjicpm2 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | March 18, 2009 01:41 |
Steadystate versus Transient solver | pda | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 11, 2007 09:36 |
Transient UDS with coupled solver | Dmitriy Makarov | FLUENT | 1 | February 9, 2007 18:06 |