CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

simpleFoam MRF validation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By crixman

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 23, 2013, 19:26
Default simpleFoam MRF validation
  #1
mpl
New Member
 
Mark L
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
mpl is on a distinguished road
Hello!

I'm experimenting with the MRF capability in the simpleFoam solver (turbulence turned off). I'm trying to compare rotatingWallVelocity vs. fvOptions to establish the rotating walls. As a validation and trying to understand how to set up the problem, I'm just using a simple rotating cylinder and I'm trying to see the pressure rise at the outer boundary (like a centrifuge).

My problem is that this doesn't seem to converge. It should be a simple problem that readily converges.

I've attached my blockMeshDict, 0/p and 0/U.

Any suggestions would be appreciated!

Best regards,
Mark


0/p:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
location "0";
object p;
}

dimensions [ 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 ];

internalField uniform 101.325;

boundaryField
{
ID
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 101.325;
}
OD
{
type zeroGradient;
}
TB
{
type empty;
}
}

0/U:
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
location "0";
object U;
}






dimensions [ 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 ];

internalField uniform ( 0 0 0 );

boundaryField
{
ID
{
type rotatingWallVelocity;
origin (0 0 0);
axis (0 1 0);
omega 837;
// type fixedValue;
// value uniform (0 0 0);
}
OD
{
type rotatingWallVelocity;
origin ( 0.0 0.0 0.0 );
axis ( 0.0 1.0 0.0 );
omega 837;
// type fixedValue;
// value uniform (0 0 0);
// type surfaceNormalFixedValue;
// refValue uniform 0;
}
TB
{
type empty;
}
}


blockMeshDict:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 2.1.1 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
object blockMeshDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //









convertToMeters 0.001;

vertices
(
(25 0 0)
(100 0 0)
(0 0 100)
(0 0 25)
(-25 0 0)
(-100 0 0)
(0 0 -25)
(0 0 -100)
(25 5 0)
(100 5 0)
(0 5 100)
(0 5 25)
(-25 5 0)
(-100 5 0)
(0 5 -25)
(0 5 -100)
);

blocks
(
hex (0 1 9 8 3 2 10 11) rotor (20 1 30) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (3 2 10 11 4 5 13 12) rotor (20 1 30) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (4 5 13 12 6 7 15 14) rotor (20 1 30 ) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (6 7 15 14 0 1 9 8) rotor (20 1 30) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
);

edges
(
arc 1 2 (70.7106781202421 0 70.7106781202421)
arc 2 5 (-70.7106781202421 0 70.7106781202421)
arc 5 7 (-70.7106781202421 0 -70.7106781202421)
arc 7 1 (70.7106781202421 0 -70.7106781202421)
arc 3 0 (17.6776695300605 0 17.6776695300605)
arc 3 4 (-17.6776695300605 0 17.6776695300605)
arc 4 6 (-17.6776695300605 0 -17.6776695300605)
arc 6 0 (17.6776695300605 0 -17.6776695300605)
arc 9 10 (70.7106781202421 5 70.7106781202421)
arc 10 13 (-70.7106781202421 5 70.7106781202421)
arc 13 15 (-70.7106781202421 5 -70.7106781202421)
arc 15 9 (70.7106781202421 5 -70.7106781202421)
arc 8 11 (17.6776695300605 5 17.6776695300605)
arc 11 12 (-17.6776695300605 5 17.6776695300605)
arc 12 14 (-17.6776695300605 5 -17.6776695300605)
arc 14 8 (17.6776695300605 5 -17.6776695300605)
);

boundary
(
TB
{
type empty;
faces
(
(11 10 9 8)
(13 10 11 12)
(13 12 14 15)
(15 14 8 9)
(0 1 2 3)
(3 2 5 4)
(4 5 7 6)
(6 7 1 0)
);
}
OD
{
type patch;
faces
(
(1 9 10 2)
(13 5 2 10)
(15 7 5 13)
(7 15 9 1)
);
}
ID
{
type patch;
faces
(
(8 0 3 11)
(11 3 4 12)
(12 4 6 14)
(14 6 0 8)
);
}
);

mergePatchPairs
(
);

// ************************************************** *********************** //
mpl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2014, 13:17
Default
  #2
Member
 
crixman's Avatar
 
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12
crixman is on a distinguished road
Hi Mark, did you make any progress?
I am using simpleFoam with fvOptions for MRF (OF 2.2.2.), making the geometry with Salome and meshing with cfMesh - I find it much easier to setup!
JR22 likes this.
crixman is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 January 31, 2020 16:26
simpleFoam Validation in Urban Environment using AIJ guidelines (openCAE) JR22 OpenFOAM Verification & Validation 30 July 23, 2014 10:07
CFX problem in ubuntu (linux) Vigneshramaero CFX 0 July 13, 2012 11:22
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam spsb OpenFOAM 3 February 24, 2012 10:07
CFX-Pre problem, pls help!!! cth_yao CFX 0 February 17, 2012 01:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06.