|
[Sponsors] |
August 30, 2012, 21:37 |
OpenFoam Solid Stress Anlalisys
|
#1 |
New Member
Humberto
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello I am trying to do stress analysis of a Structural insulated panel, with SolidEquilibriumDisplacementFoam, without luck, here is case directory to download:
http://www.filedropper.com/sip Somehow the solution is not generating any stresses inside the panel. Please any help will be greatly appreciated. Last edited by tokotico; September 10, 2012 at 19:52. Reason: Link Update |
|
August 31, 2012, 20:42 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Hi,
What errors are you getting? I had a quick look at your case and your mechanical properties are not declared correctly (as in the $FOAM_TUTORIALS/stressAnalysis/solidEquilibriumDisplacementFoam/beamEndLoad case). Also you have a defaultFaces patch which is empty. Philip |
|
September 1, 2012, 00:21 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Humberto
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
The defaultFaces patch I included it because it also exists on the tutorial. the behavior is strange, the program only runs for nu = 0 and at the end the panel shows with 0 stress and 0 deformation everywhere. If I change nu=0.2 the solver crashes on iteration 550. while solving it alwas shows kineticEnergy = 0 kineticPower = 0 smi = 0 so basically nothing is happening I do not understand why!!!. |
||
September 1, 2012, 11:12 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Hi,
Ah the mechanicalProperties definition has changed in the standard OpenFOAM, OK that's fine. As regards the defaultFaces patch, you have the boundary condition set to empty on this patch, but you can only use empty for 1-D or 2-D cases and your case is 3-D so I presume this boundary conditions is meant to be traction-free or something like that? Also, has the case converged i.e. have you run the case for multiple time-steps OR have you increased the number of outer correctors? Philip |
|
September 10, 2012, 19:46 |
Various Materials
|
#5 |
New Member
Humberto
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks for all your help Bigphil, I got rid of the empty patches thanks for the observation, but still it does not even converge.
I was wondering, How do I define two different materials right now I have FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "constant"; object mechanicalProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // rho { type uniform; value 1200; } nu { type uniform; value 0.1; } E { type uniform; value 5558500000; } planeStress no; Thanks in advance for all your help!!! |
|
September 12, 2012, 05:36 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Hi Humberto,
To begin with, I would recommend you use "solidDisplacementFoam" in preference to "solidEquilibriumDisplacementFoam" even for steady state simulations (solidEquilibriumDisplacementFoams implementation tries to increase the convergence of steady state models using some tricks but I have found that it does not converge for Poisson's ratio's greater than zero). solidDisplacementFoam can simulate steady state by setting the d2dt2Scheme to steadyState. This will probably fix your convergence issues. As regards multi-material, you could replace the rho, nu, E uniform fields with non-uniform fields, however, I am not sure if there is a utility to do this. So I would recommend you use the solidMechanics solvers in OpenFOAM-1.6-ext which allow straight-forward simulation of multi-material bodies, however I am a bit biased . The tutorial OpenFOAM-1.6-ext/applications/solvers/solidMechanics/tutorials/elasticSolidFoam/bimaterialCase shows how to do it. Philip |
|
September 19, 2012, 09:13 |
|
#7 |
New Member
|
I also worked on modifying the solidDisplacementFoam solver to incorporate varying material parameters as fields in the same mesh, it "worked" in the sense that it converged and gave an output (identical to solidDisplacementFoam in the case of homogenous material), but I'm not sure about the physical reliability of the result.
I'm still using 1.7.x since when I first tried version 2 it tended to diverge. I might try 2.1.x. Also I wrote something to extract the strain, if that's ever useful to anyone else. |
|
October 6, 2012, 20:15 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
jon pry
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Thanks, Jon Pry |
||
October 7, 2012, 08:13 |
|
#9 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
As I mentioned previously there are solvers in the solidMechanics branch of OpenFOAM-1.6-ext which are specifically designed for heterogeneous material properties. There has also been a paper recently published which is the basis of the adopted methods. Additionally strain fields are output. Best regards, Philip |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem with Min/max rho | tH3f0rC3 | OpenFOAM | 8 | July 31, 2019 10:48 |
Is there any anisotropic solver for solid stress analysis? | stickjohnson | OpenFOAM | 6 | October 31, 2011 15:51 |
What BC for a solid in OpenFoam? | cristina87 | OpenFOAM | 2 | May 11, 2011 19:15 |
Defining Solid Zones Not working | elmcmaster | FLUENT | 3 | May 22, 2009 08:14 |
OpenFOAM Training in Europe and USA | hjasak | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 8, 2008 06:33 |