|
[Sponsors] |
August 2, 2012, 14:59 |
Sliding interface in parallel
|
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I am trying to run the mixer2D tutorial in OF1.6-ext (with sliding interface, not GGI) in parallel. After the first time step I get this error: Quote:
Does anyone know where is the problem? As far as I know the Sliding Interface modifier is already fully parallelized. Or am I wrong? Thanks a lot Ivan |
||
October 14, 2013, 07:07 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello Ivan,
I am also facing the similar problem, did you find any solution for it ? Regards Sayali |
|
October 16, 2013, 17:22 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear Sayali,
no, no solution so far :-( Ivan |
|
May 31, 2018, 13:19 |
Same issue in foam-extend 4.0
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi All,
I am facing this issue with newer version of foam-extend. Please could anybody kindly advice the best practice for running sliding interface in parallel Many thanks Michael |
|
June 2, 2018, 13:05 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Santiago Lopez Castano
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 354
Rep Power: 16 |
With ggi at least you need to create global cell zones with the sliding patches. Also, these patches have to live in the same address space, i.e. in the same processor.
|
|
June 3, 2018, 08:57 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
Thanks for the tip. I have managed to do the above successfully through the decomposeParDict file. However on running using mpirun I get a segmentation fault error after "Selecting dynamicFvMesh mixerFvMesh" line in the log file Not sure if there is something obvious I am missing, and also how to analyse the error log/trace Thanks Michael |
||
March 20, 2019, 12:15 |
same problem
|
#7 | |
Member
Saleh Abuhanieh
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Hi Michael, I am working on sliding interface case. I was able to run it using two processors only (simple decomposition). Have you solved the problem? |
||
March 21, 2019, 08:06 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Saleh
I don't use foam-extend much anymore, but from looking at this old case I seem to have it run ok using 4 processors |
|
March 21, 2019, 11:53 |
|
#9 |
Member
Saleh Abuhanieh
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi Michael,
Is it possible to share the dynamicMeshDict ? In my case, only the simple algorithm works for 2 partitions only. Each partition contains one pair of the sliding without crossing the sliding interface and without using any constrains. I've tried almost every possibility without success. Regards, |
|
March 24, 2019, 18:29 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
File is attached.
|
|
March 25, 2019, 03:04 |
|
#11 |
Member
Saleh Abuhanieh
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 8 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
Intersecting sliding interface | jaswi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 15, 2008 01:07 |
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair | lego | CFX | 3 | November 5, 2002 21:09 |