|
[Sponsors] |
April 21, 2012, 16:44 |
chtMultiRegionFOAM derived fvPatchFields
|
#1 |
New Member
Gilles De Neyer
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
I don't understand something about the solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupled boundary condition. "// Both sides agree on // - temperature : (myKDelta*fld + nbrKDelta*nbrFld)/(myKDelta+nbrKDelta) // - gradient : (temperature-fld)*delta // We've got a degree of freedom in how to implement this in a mixed bc. // (what gradient, what fixedValue and mixing coefficient) // Two reasonable choices: // 1. specify above temperature on one side (preferentially the high side) // and above gradient on the other. So this will switch between pure // fixedvalue and pure fixedgradient // 2. specify gradient and temperature such that the equations are the // same on both sides. This leads to the choice of // - refGradient = zero gradient // - refValue = neighbour value // - mixFraction = nbrKDelta / (nbrKDelta + myKDelta()) " I don't understand the second choice (which is implemented). Why fixing theses values for refGradient, refValue and mixFraction leads to the similitude of the equations on both sides ? Thanks, Gilles |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error in chtMultiRegionFoam | kirankarki | OpenFOAM | 6 | August 21, 2018 09:00 |
Embed explicitSetValue in chtMultiRegionFoam | samiam1000 | OpenFOAM | 2 | April 18, 2012 06:14 |
chtmultiregionFoam | alvora | OpenFOAM | 9 | February 23, 2011 04:06 |
Creating 100 derived parts / Splitting derived parts for mass flux calculation | xamo | STAR-CCM+ | 8 | September 29, 2009 06:35 |
Derived velocities from loss coefficients ?? | jakjak | CFX | 1 | December 20, 2007 15:38 |