|
[Sponsors] |
January 15, 2009, 17:26 |
Dimensionless parameters
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi all,
I need to define in the transport properties dictionary that do not have dimensions. My strategy was to define them as dimensioned, but placing only zeros in the dimensions definitions. Is this correct, or there is any command that can be used? Thanks in advance, Antonio |
|
January 16, 2009, 03:59 |
Hi
Put the following code i
|
#2 |
Member
florian
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mannheim - Vincennes - Valenciennes, Deutchland - France
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
Put the following code in createFields.H: dimensionedScalar name ( transportProperties.lookup("name") ); and then this one in transportProperties files: name name [0 0 0 0 0 0 0] 0.5; Florian |
|
January 16, 2009, 06:11 |
I'd first recommend adding a s
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: https://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 1,715
Rep Power: 40 |
I'd first recommend adding a subdictionary to transport properties to avoid possible collision with existing or future names and to cleanly group your variables. I'd also assume that you'd like to enter dimensionless variables without needing to enter the "[0 0 0 0 0]" dimensions, or even bother with adding the name twice (once for the dictionary keyword and once for the dimensionedScalar).
In transportProperties (or somewhere else), add your subdictionary: antonioSpecialDict { firstParam 1.0; secondParam 2.0; } Then in your code (eg, createFields.H), use the lookupOrAddToDict static member: dimensionedScalar param1 ( dimensionedScalar::lookupOrAddToDict ("firstParam", antonioDict, 10) ); dimensionedScalar param2 ( dimensionedScalar::lookupOrAddToDict ( "secondParam", antonioDict, 20 ) ); dimensionedScalar param3 ( dimensionedScalar::lookupOrAddToDict ("thirdParam", antonioDict, 30) ); This approach not only saves lots of typing in the dictionary, it also lets you specify default values. If you wish to be extra safe, you'll want to check the original dictionary (eg, transportProperties) for the "antonioSpecialDict" first, and supply the code with an alternative place to edit if necessary. I guess that dimensionedType should actually have a normal dict lookup (eg, lookupOrDefault) that doesn't alter the dictionary. Maybe you should submit a enhancement request for that. |
|
February 29, 2016, 04:26 |
|
#4 |
Member
Muhammad Usman
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 0 |
Simply use
varible = runTime.controlDict().lookupOrDefault<scalar>("var ible", 0); |
|
December 10, 2016, 08:06 |
to use the dimensionless N-S equations in OpenFOAM
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Bill Wang
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 12 |
Dear,
I want to use the dimensionless equations in OpenFOAM. Anyone knows how to turn off the dimension checking? I have posted my problem here How to use the dimensionless N-S equations in OpenFOAM Thank you in advance for any suggestions. Best Regards, Bill |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dimensionless Analysis | Seamus | FLUENT | 1 | February 28, 2011 13:18 |
Dimensionless numbers | kuba | FLUENT | 2 | September 6, 2007 05:48 |
Dimensionless quantities | badri1979 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | August 22, 2006 18:47 |
dimensionless equation | Subrat Das | CFX | 0 | December 10, 2001 06:30 |
DIMENSIONLESS SOLVER | SC HU | FLUENT | 2 | July 27, 2000 22:58 |