|
[Sponsors] |
June 12, 2021, 19:34 |
AMI implementation: Foundation vs. ESI
|
#1 |
Member
hekseli
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 13 |
Hey,
I happened to notice that the AMI interpolation implementation differs between the Foundation and ESI versions. In particular, features presented here https://www.openfoam.com/news/main-n...20-06/numerics raised my interest whether I should try ESI version for my AMI cases. Has anyone carried out any tests regarding pros and cons between the implementation? I'm also interested in hearing the history related to separation of AMI implementations. |
|
July 1, 2021, 12:53 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Erick D. Martinez
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Texas
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 6 |
I used to have some issues developing a working AMI when I was using OF7. It took me months of trying different things with my snappyHexMeshDict when the AMI examples seemed pretty straight forward. This made me look for overset meshing as an alternative, which is only available in the ESI version. Once I started using the ESI version I tried doing AMI again and it worked instantly. I went through the whole process on both ESI and OF Foundation versions and the exact same mesh generated a working AMI with ESI but it failed in OF Foundation. This was my experience at least. But from this I prefer ESI for any AMI development.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error running AMI propeller simulation | luitzor | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 19, 2021 14:48 |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
[swak4Foam] reconstructPar error in MRFsimpleFoam (ami apprach) using GroovyBC velocity inlet | Krao | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 3 | August 19, 2019 06:40 |
mapField error | rvl565 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 1 | September 6, 2018 17:13 |
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 10, 2013 10:34 |